Following the adoption of the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to discovery in 2000, Prof. Tobias notes the lack of empirical research or other indication of how the new rules might work in practice preceding their enactment. He suggests that Congress should reconsider a reject 1983 amendment to F.R.C.P. 83 which would authorize courts to obtain Judicial Conference approval to test promising mechanisms for five years before adoption
On December 1, 1993, the most comprehensive package of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Proc...
Federal civil procedure is now byzantine. Lawyers and parties face, and federal judges apply, a bewi...
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Procedure and Evidence become effective three years from initial ...
The recent resolve of the Advisory Committee on the Civil Rules to revisit reform of the discovery r...
In April 2000, the United States Supreme Court promulgated, and Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist t...
Congress reformed the procedures for amending the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1988 by prescr...
Response to Edward H. Cooper, Simplified Rules of Federal Procedure1, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 1794 (2002
Professor Tobias\u27 recommendations to the Montana Supreme Court regarding the newly amended F.R.C....
Writing in 1924, seventy-eight volumes ago, Professor Edson R. Sunderland began The Machinery of Pro...
Writing in 1924, seventy-eight volumes ago, Professor Edson R. Sunderland began The Machinery of Pro...
The 1983 revision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 11 or the Rule ) prove...
Much activity related to civil procedure recently occurred that could significantly affect practice ...
In this article, Professor Tobias analyzes and attempts to harmonize the conflicting frameworks for ...
This issue includes a notice informing subscribers that Congress took no action on the package of am...
During the 1980s, both the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is the policy-making arm ...
On December 1, 1993, the most comprehensive package of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Proc...
Federal civil procedure is now byzantine. Lawyers and parties face, and federal judges apply, a bewi...
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Procedure and Evidence become effective three years from initial ...
The recent resolve of the Advisory Committee on the Civil Rules to revisit reform of the discovery r...
In April 2000, the United States Supreme Court promulgated, and Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist t...
Congress reformed the procedures for amending the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1988 by prescr...
Response to Edward H. Cooper, Simplified Rules of Federal Procedure1, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 1794 (2002
Professor Tobias\u27 recommendations to the Montana Supreme Court regarding the newly amended F.R.C....
Writing in 1924, seventy-eight volumes ago, Professor Edson R. Sunderland began The Machinery of Pro...
Writing in 1924, seventy-eight volumes ago, Professor Edson R. Sunderland began The Machinery of Pro...
The 1983 revision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 11 or the Rule ) prove...
Much activity related to civil procedure recently occurred that could significantly affect practice ...
In this article, Professor Tobias analyzes and attempts to harmonize the conflicting frameworks for ...
This issue includes a notice informing subscribers that Congress took no action on the package of am...
During the 1980s, both the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is the policy-making arm ...
On December 1, 1993, the most comprehensive package of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Proc...
Federal civil procedure is now byzantine. Lawyers and parties face, and federal judges apply, a bewi...
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Procedure and Evidence become effective three years from initial ...