Add to ORKGThis Article begins by demonstrating that the proliferation of local rules indeed poses a threat to the integrity and uniformity of federal procedure. The Article next examines the general policies relating to local rulemaking. Based on that analysis, the final section presents specific proposals for rethinking rule 83 to permit informed local control over truly local matters, while placing beyond the reach of district courts those matters that are national in scope
This article addresses a little known role of the United States Courts of Appeals to review district...
Federal district courts have viewed the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 as a mandate to adopt proce...
During the 1980s, both the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is the policy-making arm ...
This Article begins by demonstrating that the proliferation of local rules indeed poses a threat to ...
In 1938, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted. Their adoption represented a triumph of ...
In conformity with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each district court may specify its own spe...
(Excerpt) This Article examines and analyzes (1) the wisdom of addressing pervasive problems in the ...
Federal district courts have viewed the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 as a mandate to adopt proce...
Local rules of court are supposed to be consistent with but not duplicative of federal rules. This A...
Local rules of court are supposed to be consistent with but not duplicative of federal rules. This A...
Federal civil procedure is now byzantine. Lawyers and parties face, and federal judges apply, a bewi...
We have criticized the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure since the 1980s and the pr...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
This article addresses a little known role of the United States Courts of Appeals to review district...
Federal district courts have viewed the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 as a mandate to adopt proce...
During the 1980s, both the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is the policy-making arm ...
This Article begins by demonstrating that the proliferation of local rules indeed poses a threat to ...
In 1938, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted. Their adoption represented a triumph of ...
In conformity with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each district court may specify its own spe...
(Excerpt) This Article examines and analyzes (1) the wisdom of addressing pervasive problems in the ...
Federal district courts have viewed the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 as a mandate to adopt proce...
Local rules of court are supposed to be consistent with but not duplicative of federal rules. This A...
Local rules of court are supposed to be consistent with but not duplicative of federal rules. This A...
Federal civil procedure is now byzantine. Lawyers and parties face, and federal judges apply, a bewi...
We have criticized the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure since the 1980s and the pr...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
This article addresses a little known role of the United States Courts of Appeals to review district...
Federal district courts have viewed the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 as a mandate to adopt proce...
During the 1980s, both the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is the policy-making arm ...