Add to ORKGThe Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclusion principles unless Congress clearly indicates otherwise. Part II considers a number of indicators of Congress\u27s intent, and finds no evidence to rebut the presumption that federal courts must give preclusive weight to certain state decisions. Part III then proposes general guidelines for the application of preclusion doctrines in title VII litigation
This Note is concerned primarily with the possibility of granting preclusive effect to the Board\u27...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
Preclusion is not a simple principle; it is a multifaceted concept affected by a number of relevant ...
The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclus...
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide a comprehensive scheme to battle discriminat...
This article previews the Supreme Court case St. Mary\u27s Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993...
This article examines the use of the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude litigation of statu...
The interrelation of lawsuits is one of the most troublesome, yet least commented upon, areas of the...
During the 2005 survey year, federal courts in the Second Circuit decided a number of important res ...
This article previews the Supreme Court case Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Vaughn, 466 U.S. 521 (19...
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...
Currently, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, courts are not required to include findings o...
While the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that claims based on statutory rights may ...
The Civil Rights Act of 1991, which provides compensatory and punitive damages and attendant jury tr...
The Supreme Court has recently hinted that courts should use proximate cause in Title VII cases. Thi...
This Note is concerned primarily with the possibility of granting preclusive effect to the Board\u27...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
Preclusion is not a simple principle; it is a multifaceted concept affected by a number of relevant ...
The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclus...
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide a comprehensive scheme to battle discriminat...
This article previews the Supreme Court case St. Mary\u27s Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993...
This article examines the use of the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude litigation of statu...
The interrelation of lawsuits is one of the most troublesome, yet least commented upon, areas of the...
During the 2005 survey year, federal courts in the Second Circuit decided a number of important res ...
This article previews the Supreme Court case Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Vaughn, 466 U.S. 521 (19...
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...
Currently, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, courts are not required to include findings o...
While the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that claims based on statutory rights may ...
The Civil Rights Act of 1991, which provides compensatory and punitive damages and attendant jury tr...
The Supreme Court has recently hinted that courts should use proximate cause in Title VII cases. Thi...
This Note is concerned primarily with the possibility of granting preclusive effect to the Board\u27...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
Preclusion is not a simple principle; it is a multifaceted concept affected by a number of relevant ...