This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possible for victims of employment discrimination through a discussion of case law under title VII and the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA). It will examine the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC and suggest that the Court\u27s imposition of a rigid rule upon lower courts to toll backpay liability reverses the trend. Finally, the Note will consider the impact of this rule upon future title VII litigants. It will conclude that while the rule may vindicate the rights of most victims, it will fall short of making whole those discriminatees who have found alternative work and have accrued some seniority prior to receiving an unco...
This casenote examines a Ninth Circuit decision that considered the impact of the Civil Rights Act o...
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide a comprehensive scheme to battle discriminat...
While the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that claims based on statutory rights may ...
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides administrative and judicial remedies for victims ...
This Note argues that federal courts should not deduct unemployment insurance benefits from Title VI...
With the maturing of employment law and litigation, the shift away from class action to individual l...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
In one of its most controversial decisions in years, the Supreme Court in May issued a 5-4 ruling in...
The author questions whether the dicta in a recent Supreme Court case, Local Union No. 1784 v. Stott...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
A critical aspect of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the Act) was to pressure employers b...
Congress has prohibited discrimination in employment by enacting Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights ...
On June 12, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the United States Dis...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that a collective bargaining contr...
This casenote examines a Ninth Circuit decision that considered the impact of the Civil Rights Act o...
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide a comprehensive scheme to battle discriminat...
While the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that claims based on statutory rights may ...
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides administrative and judicial remedies for victims ...
This Note argues that federal courts should not deduct unemployment insurance benefits from Title VI...
With the maturing of employment law and litigation, the shift away from class action to individual l...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
In one of its most controversial decisions in years, the Supreme Court in May issued a 5-4 ruling in...
The author questions whether the dicta in a recent Supreme Court case, Local Union No. 1784 v. Stott...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
A critical aspect of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the Act) was to pressure employers b...
Congress has prohibited discrimination in employment by enacting Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights ...
On June 12, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the United States Dis...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that a collective bargaining contr...
This casenote examines a Ninth Circuit decision that considered the impact of the Civil Rights Act o...
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide a comprehensive scheme to battle discriminat...
While the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that claims based on statutory rights may ...