Add to ORKGTitle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discrimination matters and sanctions orders of affirmative relief where equitable. This relief, usually in the form of back pay and injunctions, may be awarded upon a finding of intentional, discriminatory labor practices. Being equitable remedies, however, the courts have given numerous and conflicting interpretations as to when such affirmative relief should be awarded or denied. The prior history of Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody typifies the inconsistencies in this area. The case was a class action under Title VII by former and present employees of Albemarle Paper Company. The class, after following the designated administrative procedures, file...
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a non-discriminatory bottom line is no defens...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that dismissal for failure to comp...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
The United States Supreme Court has held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars racial ...
For many years the brunt of racial discrimination was sorely felt in the area of employment. Today, ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides administrative and judicial remedies for victims ...
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has held that a white male is not a ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that it is an unlawful employment practice to dis...
When Congress passed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it did not extend the coverage of th...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Conn. 1975). As the federal judiciary continu...
With the maturing of employment law and litigation, the shift away from class action to individual l...
Report of the 1969 Proceedings of the Section of Labor Relations Law, American Bar Association
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a non-discriminatory bottom line is no defens...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that dismissal for failure to comp...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
The United States Supreme Court has held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars racial ...
For many years the brunt of racial discrimination was sorely felt in the area of employment. Today, ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides administrative and judicial remedies for victims ...
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has held that a white male is not a ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that it is an unlawful employment practice to dis...
When Congress passed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it did not extend the coverage of th...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Conn. 1975). As the federal judiciary continu...
With the maturing of employment law and litigation, the shift away from class action to individual l...
Report of the 1969 Proceedings of the Section of Labor Relations Law, American Bar Association
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a non-discriminatory bottom line is no defens...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that dismissal for failure to comp...