Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court has held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars racial discrimination against white persons in private employment upon the same standards as nonwhites and that section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 provides a federal remedy against private discrimination in employment against whites as well as nonwhites. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co., 427 U.S. 273 (1976)
Two major vehicles for redressing private racial discrimination are Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. ...
When Congress passed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it did not extend the coverage of th...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT in McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.\u27 held that Title...
For many years the brunt of racial discrimination was sorely felt in the area of employment. Today, ...
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has held that a white male is not a ...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that dismissal for failure to comp...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a non-discriminatory bottom line is no defens...
In 1964, Congress passed comprehensive legislation aimed at eradicating discrimination in employment...
The United States Supreme Court held that Title VII\u27s anti-retaliation provision is not limited t...
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Conn. 1975). As the federal judiciary continu...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that it is an unlawful employment practice to dis...
Two major vehicles for redressing private racial discrimination are Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. ...
When Congress passed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it did not extend the coverage of th...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT in McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.\u27 held that Title...
For many years the brunt of racial discrimination was sorely felt in the area of employment. Today, ...
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has held that a white male is not a ...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that dismissal for failure to comp...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a non-discriminatory bottom line is no defens...
In 1964, Congress passed comprehensive legislation aimed at eradicating discrimination in employment...
The United States Supreme Court held that Title VII\u27s anti-retaliation provision is not limited t...
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Conn. 1975). As the federal judiciary continu...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that it is an unlawful employment practice to dis...
Two major vehicles for redressing private racial discrimination are Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. ...
When Congress passed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it did not extend the coverage of th...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...