The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that a collective bargaining contract provision for layoffs by reverse order employment seniority is consistent with a coexisting conciliation agreement for increased minority hiring which is silent respecting overall seniority and with public policy enunciated by Title VII, since a facially neutral plant-wide seniority system is bona fide within the meaning of Title VII, section 703(h), notwithstanding perpetuation of past discrimination. Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Local 327, IBEW, 508 F.2d 687 (3d Cir. 1975), petition for cert. filed, 44 U.S.L.W. 3111 (U.S. Aug. 1, 1975) (No. 182)
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
The article discusses Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It mentions that Title VII focuses on ...
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...
Jersey Central Power and Light Co. v. Local 327, IBEW, 508 F. 2d 687 (3d Cir. 1975). Title VII of th...
Seniority provisions frequently work to the disadvantage of minorities because earlier employment di...
Congress intended to solve the widespread problem of nonegalitarian hiring practices by enacting tit...
Congress has prohibited discrimination in employment by enacting Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which became effective on July 2, 1965, was enacted to el...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
The United States Supreme Court has held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars racial ...
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has held that a white male is not a ...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
Affirmative action hiring and promotion programs are intended to provide minority workers the opport...
For many years the brunt of racial discrimination was sorely felt in the area of employment. Today, ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
The article discusses Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It mentions that Title VII focuses on ...
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...
Jersey Central Power and Light Co. v. Local 327, IBEW, 508 F. 2d 687 (3d Cir. 1975). Title VII of th...
Seniority provisions frequently work to the disadvantage of minorities because earlier employment di...
Congress intended to solve the widespread problem of nonegalitarian hiring practices by enacting tit...
Congress has prohibited discrimination in employment by enacting Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which became effective on July 2, 1965, was enacted to el...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
The United States Supreme Court has held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars racial ...
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has held that a white male is not a ...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
Affirmative action hiring and promotion programs are intended to provide minority workers the opport...
For many years the brunt of racial discrimination was sorely felt in the area of employment. Today, ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
The article discusses Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It mentions that Title VII focuses on ...
This Note will outline the historical trend of favoring an award of the most complete relief possibl...