Add to ORKGThis article previews the Supreme Court case Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Vaughn, 466 U.S. 521 (1984). The author expected the Court to clarify the evidentiary requirements and burdens of plaintiffs and defendants in litigating a disparate treatment claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
The author questions whether the dicta in a recent Supreme Court case, Local Union No. 1784 v. Stott...
Enacted for the purpose of battling workplace discrimination by targeting discrimination against min...
This article initially examines the traditional theories of proof in Title VII cases. It then discus...
This article previews the Supreme Court case Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Vaughn, 466 U.S. 521 (19...
This article previews the Supreme Court case St. Mary\u27s Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993...
This Article addresses the connections among substance, procedure, and equality in the American work...
The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclus...
The article discusses Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It mentions that Title VII focuses on ...
employed women, and other minorities throughout the United States. The opinion has several significa...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits employment discrimination on the basis...
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide a comprehensive scheme to battle discriminat...
(Excerpt) This Article focuses on judicial lawmaking and policymaking in an important area of antidi...
In the summer of 2013, the Supreme Court ruled on University of Texas Southwest Medical Center v. Na...
This article discusses how Title VII affects the operation of these facially neutral practices and a...
The emergence of a more conservative federal judiciary in recent years has produced many changes in ...
The author questions whether the dicta in a recent Supreme Court case, Local Union No. 1784 v. Stott...
Enacted for the purpose of battling workplace discrimination by targeting discrimination against min...
This article initially examines the traditional theories of proof in Title VII cases. It then discus...
This article previews the Supreme Court case Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Vaughn, 466 U.S. 521 (19...
This article previews the Supreme Court case St. Mary\u27s Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993...
This Article addresses the connections among substance, procedure, and equality in the American work...
The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclus...
The article discusses Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It mentions that Title VII focuses on ...
employed women, and other minorities throughout the United States. The opinion has several significa...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits employment discrimination on the basis...
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide a comprehensive scheme to battle discriminat...
(Excerpt) This Article focuses on judicial lawmaking and policymaking in an important area of antidi...
In the summer of 2013, the Supreme Court ruled on University of Texas Southwest Medical Center v. Na...
This article discusses how Title VII affects the operation of these facially neutral practices and a...
The emergence of a more conservative federal judiciary in recent years has produced many changes in ...
The author questions whether the dicta in a recent Supreme Court case, Local Union No. 1784 v. Stott...
Enacted for the purpose of battling workplace discrimination by targeting discrimination against min...
This article initially examines the traditional theories of proof in Title VII cases. It then discus...