No-strike clauses in which unions promise not to strike or engage in work stoppages appeared in more than 94 per cent of all collective bargaining agreements in 1960.1 The no-strike clause is of manifest importance to the employer, for it is obtained as its sole assurance that business operations will continue uninterrupted by inevitable labor-management disagreements. It has long been thought that specific enforcement was the only satisfactory employer remedy for breach of a no-strike clause,\u27 but a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court, Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson,3 has held that federal courts may not issue injunctions for breach of a no-strike clause and has cast grave doubt upon the appropriateness of the injuncti...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a federal court may enjoin a strike which viola...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
The United States Supreme Court, in Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen...
A union picketed interstate motor carriers to induce non-union clerical employees to join the union,...
The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and union contained a no-strike provision. ...
The Norris-LaGuardia Act was enacted in 1932 to curb the unbridled use of the federal injunction as ...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act prohibits a federal di...
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provi...
One consideration will support several promises. A promisor may extract more than one promise in ret...
A demonstration protesting the proper discharge of two union officials resulted in the discharge of ...
The conventional National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) remedy against an employer who has violated s...
Most collective labor agreements contain a no-strike clause, a promise by the union that it will not...
Employer and Union were parties to a collective bargaining agreement in which Union had promised not...
One of the employer\u27s traditional weapons against the economic power of unions is the lockout. Si...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a federal court may enjoin a strike which viola...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
The United States Supreme Court, in Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen...
A union picketed interstate motor carriers to induce non-union clerical employees to join the union,...
The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and union contained a no-strike provision. ...
The Norris-LaGuardia Act was enacted in 1932 to curb the unbridled use of the federal injunction as ...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act prohibits a federal di...
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provi...
One consideration will support several promises. A promisor may extract more than one promise in ret...
A demonstration protesting the proper discharge of two union officials resulted in the discharge of ...
The conventional National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) remedy against an employer who has violated s...
Most collective labor agreements contain a no-strike clause, a promise by the union that it will not...
Employer and Union were parties to a collective bargaining agreement in which Union had promised not...
One of the employer\u27s traditional weapons against the economic power of unions is the lockout. Si...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a federal court may enjoin a strike which viola...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
The United States Supreme Court, in Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen...