One consideration will support several promises. A promisor may extract more than one promise in return for his single undertaking to do - or not to do. It depends upon his bargaining power. His single undertaking may be so valuable that several promises are necessary to induce him to act, or not to act. He is privileged to hold out for the best deal. The law does not examine his motives or reduce his demands. And from this arises the common- law principle that one consideration may support several promises
This Comment examines the problem of sister union strikes and the potential it has of occurring in t...
The significant increase in employer proposals for concessions at the collective bargaining table ha...
The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and union contained a no-strike provision. ...
No-strike clauses in which unions promise not to strike or engage in work stoppages appeared in more...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
Most collective labor agreements contain a no-strike clause, a promise by the union that it will not...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a federal court may enjoin a strike which viola...
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provi...
The Norris-LaGuardia Act was enacted in 1932 to curb the unbridled use of the federal injunction as ...
One reflecting upon the legal nature of a collective bargaining agreement can hardly avoid beginning...
Experience indicates that in most instances the right to strike is not an essential part of the publ...
The strike is a necessary part of collective bargaining. Workers should not ordinarily lose their jo...
Most states prohibit public employees from striking and the federal government makes a strike by a f...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act prohibits a federal di...
A demonstration protesting the proper discharge of two union officials resulted in the discharge of ...
This Comment examines the problem of sister union strikes and the potential it has of occurring in t...
The significant increase in employer proposals for concessions at the collective bargaining table ha...
The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and union contained a no-strike provision. ...
No-strike clauses in which unions promise not to strike or engage in work stoppages appeared in more...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
Most collective labor agreements contain a no-strike clause, a promise by the union that it will not...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a federal court may enjoin a strike which viola...
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provi...
The Norris-LaGuardia Act was enacted in 1932 to curb the unbridled use of the federal injunction as ...
One reflecting upon the legal nature of a collective bargaining agreement can hardly avoid beginning...
Experience indicates that in most instances the right to strike is not an essential part of the publ...
The strike is a necessary part of collective bargaining. Workers should not ordinarily lose their jo...
Most states prohibit public employees from striking and the federal government makes a strike by a f...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act prohibits a federal di...
A demonstration protesting the proper discharge of two union officials resulted in the discharge of ...
This Comment examines the problem of sister union strikes and the potential it has of occurring in t...
The significant increase in employer proposals for concessions at the collective bargaining table ha...
The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and union contained a no-strike provision. ...