This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Testing = Race Discrimination?: Ricci, The Bar Exam, the LSAT, and the Challenge to Learning, which defended the Supreme Court’s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, as well as defending testing more generally against charges of irrelevance, racial obtuseness, and most seriously, race discrimination. This article specifically responds to an article written by Professor Harvey Gilmore which focuses mostly on the SAT and the LSAT
The United State Supreme Court’s review of affirmative action admissions policies in Grutter v. Boll...
As a law professor, I am a bit of an idealist. I cherish the value of higher education and cling to ...
Open Water offers a sharp normative critique of Richard Sander\u27s Stanford Law Review study (57 S...
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Tes...
Dan Subotnik responds to Andrea Curcio, Chomsky, and Eileen Kaufman, Testing, Diversity, and Merit:...
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Test...
Aptitude and achievement tests have been under heavy attack in the courts and in academic literature...
Richard Delgado replies to Dan Subotnik, Does Testing = Race Discrimination?: Ricci, the Bar Exam, t...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
Aptitude and achievement tests have been under heavy attack in the courts and in academic literature...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
This article is a response to Richard H. Sander\u27s article, A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Act...
Lawyers do not reflect the racial diversity in the United States. The legal profession continues to ...
In this Article, Professor Yelnosky responds to Professor Clark\u27s critique of his previous articl...
The United State Supreme Court’s review of affirmative action admissions policies in Grutter v. Boll...
As a law professor, I am a bit of an idealist. I cherish the value of higher education and cling to ...
Open Water offers a sharp normative critique of Richard Sander\u27s Stanford Law Review study (57 S...
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Tes...
Dan Subotnik responds to Andrea Curcio, Chomsky, and Eileen Kaufman, Testing, Diversity, and Merit:...
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Test...
Aptitude and achievement tests have been under heavy attack in the courts and in academic literature...
Richard Delgado replies to Dan Subotnik, Does Testing = Race Discrimination?: Ricci, the Bar Exam, t...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
Aptitude and achievement tests have been under heavy attack in the courts and in academic literature...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
This article is a response to Richard H. Sander\u27s article, A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Act...
Lawyers do not reflect the racial diversity in the United States. The legal profession continues to ...
In this Article, Professor Yelnosky responds to Professor Clark\u27s critique of his previous articl...
The United State Supreme Court’s review of affirmative action admissions policies in Grutter v. Boll...
As a law professor, I am a bit of an idealist. I cherish the value of higher education and cling to ...
Open Water offers a sharp normative critique of Richard Sander\u27s Stanford Law Review study (57 S...