Topics
ChomskyPerson
Dan Subotnik responds to Andrea Curcio, Chomsky, and Eileen Kaufman, Testing, Diversity, and Merit: A Reply to Dan Subotnik and Others, 9 U. Mass. L. Rev. 206 (2014)
As typified by its recent decisions in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin and Shelby County v. ...
A response and critizism of Are Law Schools Racist?: A Talk with Richard Delgad
Law schools profess a commitment to racial diversity both for the educational benefits diversity con...
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Test...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Tes...
Richard Delgado replies to Dan Subotnik, Does Testing = Race Discrimination?: Ricci, the Bar Exam, t...
Dan Subotnik responds to Richard Delgado, Standardized Testing as Discrimination: A Reply to Dan Sub...
Aptitude and achievement tests have been under heavy attack in the courts and in academic literature...
Aptitude and achievement tests have been under heavy attack in the courts and in academic literature...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
This piece is a follow-up to three pieces published in the second issue of Volume 43 of the USF Law ...
Exploring issues of racial bias and social injustice in the law school classroom is a modern imperat...
This Article is aimed primarily at guiding current law review members through a process that explore...
As typified by its recent decisions in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin and Shelby County v. ...
A response and critizism of Are Law Schools Racist?: A Talk with Richard Delgad
Law schools profess a commitment to racial diversity both for the educational benefits diversity con...
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Test...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Tes...
Richard Delgado replies to Dan Subotnik, Does Testing = Race Discrimination?: Ricci, the Bar Exam, t...
Dan Subotnik responds to Richard Delgado, Standardized Testing as Discrimination: A Reply to Dan Sub...
Aptitude and achievement tests have been under heavy attack in the courts and in academic literature...
Aptitude and achievement tests have been under heavy attack in the courts and in academic literature...
The false dichotomy between achieving diversity and rewarding merit frequently surfaces in discussio...
This piece is a follow-up to three pieces published in the second issue of Volume 43 of the USF Law ...
Exploring issues of racial bias and social injustice in the law school classroom is a modern imperat...
This Article is aimed primarily at guiding current law review members through a process that explore...
As typified by its recent decisions in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin and Shelby County v. ...
A response and critizism of Are Law Schools Racist?: A Talk with Richard Delgad
Law schools profess a commitment to racial diversity both for the educational benefits diversity con...
Add to ORKG