本学学生の体力と生活習慣 : 2006年度と2004年度を比較して

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences between the physical fitness of students in 2004 and that in2006. The subjects were 101 college students (Age: 19.0±1.24) in 2004 and 119 college students (Age: 18.9±1.33) in 2006.The measurement items were height, body weight, body fat, body mass index, grip strength, sit up, forward bent, sidestep, standing long jump and 20 m shuttle run. In addition, the questionnaire of habitual daily life was carried out aswell.Results were as follows:1) The students in the 2006 were significantly heavier in the body weight than those in the 2004.2) The students in the 2006 were significantly upper in the grip strength, sit up, side step, standing jump and 20mshuttle run than those in the 2004. There were no significantly differences in the forward bent between the students inthe 2004 and those in the 2006.3) About twenty percent students of the subjects said they were not have to take breakfast everyday.The purpose of this study was to examine the differences between the physical fitness of students in 2004 and that in2006. The subjects were 101 college students (Age: 19.0±1.24) in 2004 and 119 college students (Age: 18.9±1.33) in 2006.The measurement items were height, body weight, body fat, body mass index, grip strength, sit up, forward bent, sidestep, standing long jump and 20 m shuttle run. In addition, the questionnaire of habitual daily life was carried out aswell.Results were as follows:1) The students in the 2006 were significantly heavier in the body weight than those in the 2004.2) The students in the 2006 were significantly upper in the grip strength, sit up, side step, standing jump and 20mshuttle run than those in the 2004. There were no significantly differences in the forward bent between the students inthe 2004 and those in the 2006.3) About twenty percent students of the subjects said they were not have to take breakfast everyday