本学学生の体力と生活習慣(第4報)

This study was intended in revision of the physique evaluation standard value among the students of Shonan Instituteof Technology and to make a report in terms of their physique and physical strength. The examinees were 114 studentsin 2006(age:18.9 ± 1.34), 100 students in 2007(19.0 ± 1.29),and 30 students in 2008(19.0 ± 1.27). The Research was carriedout with regard to height, weight, grip-strength, sit-up, trunk-flexion, side-step, standing-long-jump, and 20-meter-shuttlerun.Their results were:1) The scorebook in terms of physical fitness tests was made in accordance with standard deviation and average.Grip-strength: 1point for the group less than 32 kg, 2 points for 33~39 kg, 3 points for 40~46 kg, 4 points for 47~53 kg, 5points for more than 54 kg.Sit-up: 1 points for the group less than 17 times, 2 points for 18~23 times, 3 points for 24~29 times, 4 points for 30~35 times,5 points for more than 36 times.Trunk-flexion: 1 points for the group less than 25 cm, 2 points for 26~35 cm, 3 points for 36~45 cm, 4 points for 46~55cm, 5 points for more than 56 cm.Side-step: 1 point for the group less than 36 times, 2 points for 37~45 times, 3 points for 46~53 times, 4 points for 54~61times, 5 points for more than 62 times.20-meter-shuttle-run: 1 points for the group less than 32 times, 2 points for 33~53 times, 3 points for 54~74 times, 4 pointsfor 75~95 times, 5 points for more than 96 times.Standing-long-jump: 1 point for the group less than 177 cm, 2 points for 178~204 cm, 3 points for 205~231 cm, 4 points for232~258 cm, 5 points for more than 259 cm.2) 5-rank research table was made in accordance with standard deviation and average of total points of these categories.More than 25 points were evaluated "very good", 21~24 points were "good", 17~20 points were "average", 12~16 pointswere "poor" , lees than 11 points were "very poor".3) National average marked significantly better average in height than investigation students. Investigation studentsmade obviously higher average in weight than national average.4) With regard to physical fitness tests, National average made particularly higher score in terms of all items thaninvestigation students.This study was intended in revision of the physique evaluation standard value among the students of Shonan Instituteof Technology and to make a report in terms of their physique and physical strength. The examinees were 114 studentsin 2006(age:18.9 ± 1.34), 100 students in 2007(19.0 ± 1.29),and 30 students in 2008(19.0 ± 1.27). The Research was carriedout with regard to height, weight, grip-strength, sit-up, trunk-flexion, side-step, standing-long-jump, and 20-meter-shuttlerun.Their results were:1) The scorebook in terms of physical fitness tests was made in accordance with standard deviation and average.Grip-strength: 1point for the group less than 32 kg, 2 points for 33~39 kg, 3 points for 40~46 kg, 4 points for 47~53 kg, 5points for more than 54 kg.Sit-up: 1 points for the group less than 17 times, 2 points for 18~23 times, 3 points for 24~29 times, 4 points for 30~35 times,5 points for more than 36 times.Trunk-flexion: 1 points for the group less than 25 cm, 2 points for 26~35 cm, 3 points for 36~45 cm, 4 points for 46~55cm, 5 points for more than 56 cm.Side-step: 1 point for the group less than 36 times, 2 points for 37~45 times, 3 points for 46~53 times, 4 points for 54~61times, 5 points for more than 62 times.20-meter-shuttle-run: 1 points for the group less than 32 times, 2 points for 33~53 times, 3 points for 54~74 times, 4 pointsfor 75~95 times, 5 points for more than 96 times.Standing-long-jump: 1 point for the group less than 177 cm, 2 points for 178~204 cm, 3 points for 205~231 cm, 4 points for232~258 cm, 5 points for more than 259 cm.2) 5-rank research table was made in accordance with standard deviation and average of total points of these categories.More than 25 points were evaluated "very good", 21~24 points were "good", 17~20 points were "average", 12~16 pointswere "poor" , lees than 11 points were "very poor".3) National average marked significantly better average in height than investigation students. Investigation studentsmade obviously higher average in weight than national average.4) With regard to physical fitness tests, National average made particularly higher score in terms of all items thaninvestigation students