Add to ORKGThe Court determined the presumption under NRS § 432B.550(5)(a), that a child’s best interest is to be placed together with the siblings of the child, also applies to adopted children. Further, the Court held adoption does not sever a biological sibling relationship for purposes of NRS § 432B.550(5)(a)
It is human nature to live peacefully and happily with a complete family. As a complement to a famil...
Decedent had never married and was predeceased by his natural and adopted parents. The California st...
Adoption - Inheritance from Natural Kindred - The plaintiff, a minor, by his guardian sued to recove...
The Court determined the presumption under NRS § 432B.550(5)(a), that a child’s best interest is to ...
The Court held that once parental rights have been terminated, NRS 128.110(2) is the appropriate sta...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that granting joint legal and physical custody to the non-adoptive par...
The Court determined that under NRS 3.2203 (1) an order determining physical custody of a child sati...
This Article explores the ways children, many of whom are in foster care, are psychologically harmed...
A party requesting predicate factual findings under NRS 3.2203 must only show that such findings are...
The Court determined that termination of parental rights is valid when parents fail to take necessar...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered this writ of mandamus as it held substantial precedential value ...
In a child custody case, the court of appeals clarified Nevada law by (1) defining “sole physical cu...
The Nevada Court of Appeals interpreted the best interests provision of Nevada’s child relocation st...
When the parents share joint physical custody of one minor child but one of the parents has primary ...
The court ruled that the statutory language found in NRS 125A.465, Nevada’s codification of the Unif...
It is human nature to live peacefully and happily with a complete family. As a complement to a famil...
Decedent had never married and was predeceased by his natural and adopted parents. The California st...
Adoption - Inheritance from Natural Kindred - The plaintiff, a minor, by his guardian sued to recove...
The Court determined the presumption under NRS § 432B.550(5)(a), that a child’s best interest is to ...
The Court held that once parental rights have been terminated, NRS 128.110(2) is the appropriate sta...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that granting joint legal and physical custody to the non-adoptive par...
The Court determined that under NRS 3.2203 (1) an order determining physical custody of a child sati...
This Article explores the ways children, many of whom are in foster care, are psychologically harmed...
A party requesting predicate factual findings under NRS 3.2203 must only show that such findings are...
The Court determined that termination of parental rights is valid when parents fail to take necessar...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered this writ of mandamus as it held substantial precedential value ...
In a child custody case, the court of appeals clarified Nevada law by (1) defining “sole physical cu...
The Nevada Court of Appeals interpreted the best interests provision of Nevada’s child relocation st...
When the parents share joint physical custody of one minor child but one of the parents has primary ...
The court ruled that the statutory language found in NRS 125A.465, Nevada’s codification of the Unif...
It is human nature to live peacefully and happily with a complete family. As a complement to a famil...
Decedent had never married and was predeceased by his natural and adopted parents. The California st...
Adoption - Inheritance from Natural Kindred - The plaintiff, a minor, by his guardian sued to recove...