Add to ORKGThe Court held that once parental rights have been terminated, NRS 128.110(2) is the appropriate standard for applying the familial placement preference—not NRS 432B.550(5)
A district court may sua sponte initiate the process for removing a guardian and terminating a guard...
The Court reviewed an appeal based on the termination of an individual’s parental rights. The Court ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a court must examine the strength of the existing emotio...
The Court determined that termination of parental rights is valid when parents fail to take necessar...
The Court held that once parental rights have been terminated, NRS 128.110(2) is the appropriate sta...
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division’s termination ...
The Court determined that (1) when a parent is deemed incompetent to stand a criminal trial, there i...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that (1) requiring a parent to admit guilt to a criminal act in order ...
A parent’s rights to their children cannot be terminated because a parent struggles with substance a...
In a child custody case, the court of appeals clarified Nevada law by (1) defining “sole physical cu...
The Court determined the presumption under NRS § 432B.550(5)(a), that a child’s best interest is to ...
The Court determined that under NRS 3.2203 (1) an order determining physical custody of a child sati...
When the parents share joint physical custody of one minor child but one of the parents has primary ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered this writ of mandamus as it held substantial precedential value ...
A party requesting predicate factual findings under NRS 3.2203 must only show that such findings are...
A district court may sua sponte initiate the process for removing a guardian and terminating a guard...
The Court reviewed an appeal based on the termination of an individual’s parental rights. The Court ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a court must examine the strength of the existing emotio...
The Court determined that termination of parental rights is valid when parents fail to take necessar...
The Court held that once parental rights have been terminated, NRS 128.110(2) is the appropriate sta...
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division’s termination ...
The Court determined that (1) when a parent is deemed incompetent to stand a criminal trial, there i...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that (1) requiring a parent to admit guilt to a criminal act in order ...
A parent’s rights to their children cannot be terminated because a parent struggles with substance a...
In a child custody case, the court of appeals clarified Nevada law by (1) defining “sole physical cu...
The Court determined the presumption under NRS § 432B.550(5)(a), that a child’s best interest is to ...
The Court determined that under NRS 3.2203 (1) an order determining physical custody of a child sati...
When the parents share joint physical custody of one minor child but one of the parents has primary ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered this writ of mandamus as it held substantial precedential value ...
A party requesting predicate factual findings under NRS 3.2203 must only show that such findings are...
A district court may sua sponte initiate the process for removing a guardian and terminating a guard...
The Court reviewed an appeal based on the termination of an individual’s parental rights. The Court ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a court must examine the strength of the existing emotio...