Add to ORKGThe Court determined that under NRS 3.2203 (1) an order determining physical custody of a child satisfied the dependency or custody prong for Special Immigrant Juvenile predicate findings; and (2) in order to determine predicate findings, the reunification prong is satisfied where the juvenile cannot reunify with at least one parent
The court ruled that the statutory language found in NRS 125A.465, Nevada’s codification of the Unif...
Approximately seventy percent of the juveniles arrested for violation of immigration laws are unacco...
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division’s termination ...
When determining whether the reunification prong of finding Special Immigrant Juvenile (hereinafter ...
A party requesting predicate factual findings under NRS 3.2203 must only show that such findings are...
The Court determined that termination of parental rights is valid when parents fail to take necessar...
The Court held that once parental rights have been terminated, NRS 128.110(2) is the appropriate sta...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered this writ of mandamus as it held substantial precedential value ...
On appeal from a child custody decree, the Court found the District Court did not have specific find...
The Court determined the presumption under NRS § 432B.550(5)(a), that a child’s best interest is to ...
When the parents share joint physical custody of one minor child but one of the parents has primary ...
In a child custody case, the court of appeals clarified Nevada law by (1) defining “sole physical cu...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the juvenile court properly certified a juvenile as an adult beca...
The grave consequences to an individual of an order expelling him or her from the United States has ...
The Court determined that district court’s focus—in a child custody case regarding educational place...
The court ruled that the statutory language found in NRS 125A.465, Nevada’s codification of the Unif...
Approximately seventy percent of the juveniles arrested for violation of immigration laws are unacco...
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division’s termination ...
When determining whether the reunification prong of finding Special Immigrant Juvenile (hereinafter ...
A party requesting predicate factual findings under NRS 3.2203 must only show that such findings are...
The Court determined that termination of parental rights is valid when parents fail to take necessar...
The Court held that once parental rights have been terminated, NRS 128.110(2) is the appropriate sta...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered this writ of mandamus as it held substantial precedential value ...
On appeal from a child custody decree, the Court found the District Court did not have specific find...
The Court determined the presumption under NRS § 432B.550(5)(a), that a child’s best interest is to ...
When the parents share joint physical custody of one minor child but one of the parents has primary ...
In a child custody case, the court of appeals clarified Nevada law by (1) defining “sole physical cu...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the juvenile court properly certified a juvenile as an adult beca...
The grave consequences to an individual of an order expelling him or her from the United States has ...
The Court determined that district court’s focus—in a child custody case regarding educational place...
The court ruled that the statutory language found in NRS 125A.465, Nevada’s codification of the Unif...
Approximately seventy percent of the juveniles arrested for violation of immigration laws are unacco...
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division’s termination ...