Almost all accounting doctoral graduates strive to publish their dissertations in one of the top three journals in the academic accounting discipline. This study first replicates and extends prior work to show that students that earn their degrees from more prestigious programs and those that take faculty positions at more prestigious schools are more likely to succeed in this endeavor. Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that working with individuals that have been successful publishing in the top three journals provides the advantage of sustained research productivity in these mainstream journals. Implications for academic careers and employment are drawn
Accounting doctoral education has been the subject of many conversations. Whether it supports the op...
This research employs two methods to ‘level the playing field’ when ranking accounting-education aut...
This study investigates the publication profiles of 140 accounting and finance faculty promoted to t...
Almost all accounting doctoral graduates strive to publish their dissertations in one of the top thr...
This descriptive study is a joint analysis that assesses the relative importance of PhD institution ...
Almost all accounting doctoral graduates strive to publish their dissertations in one of the top thr...
The current benchmarking literature examining faculty productivity provides limited evidence about t...
This study examines the scholarly output of accounting researchers in time periods surrounding a cha...
The purpose of this research is to determine the probability that faculty will publish in the top jo...
Part of the Accounting Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Accoun...
Prior literature on accounting journal rankings has provided different journal lists depending on th...
This paper presents an analysis of author productivity in The Accounting Review for the period 1967 ...
The primary purpose of this article is to examine whether the university affiliation of faculty mem...
As the accounting publishing market is considered inefficient, changes in accounting research agenda...
Despite the fundamental importance of publication to the academic institution, there are a significa...
Accounting doctoral education has been the subject of many conversations. Whether it supports the op...
This research employs two methods to ‘level the playing field’ when ranking accounting-education aut...
This study investigates the publication profiles of 140 accounting and finance faculty promoted to t...
Almost all accounting doctoral graduates strive to publish their dissertations in one of the top thr...
This descriptive study is a joint analysis that assesses the relative importance of PhD institution ...
Almost all accounting doctoral graduates strive to publish their dissertations in one of the top thr...
The current benchmarking literature examining faculty productivity provides limited evidence about t...
This study examines the scholarly output of accounting researchers in time periods surrounding a cha...
The purpose of this research is to determine the probability that faculty will publish in the top jo...
Part of the Accounting Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Accoun...
Prior literature on accounting journal rankings has provided different journal lists depending on th...
This paper presents an analysis of author productivity in The Accounting Review for the period 1967 ...
The primary purpose of this article is to examine whether the university affiliation of faculty mem...
As the accounting publishing market is considered inefficient, changes in accounting research agenda...
Despite the fundamental importance of publication to the academic institution, there are a significa...
Accounting doctoral education has been the subject of many conversations. Whether it supports the op...
This research employs two methods to ‘level the playing field’ when ranking accounting-education aut...
This study investigates the publication profiles of 140 accounting and finance faculty promoted to t...