Add to ORKGCrawford speculates the moneyer is the son of Gaius Fannius, consul of 122, or possibly the son of Gaius Fannius, praetor before 118. Sydenham dates this coin earlier than Crawford, to c 137-134 B.C.E, and indicates the mint of origin as 'auxiliary Italian' rather than Rome (p.48) Dr. Badian notes obverse image as Helmeted 'Roma' (in quotation marks)ROMAM·FAN·C·FHelmeted head of Roma to right; behind, ROMA downwards; before, value mark (X)Victory in quadriga to right, holding reins in left hand and wreath in right hand; below, in exergue, M·FAN·C·F (AN ligatured); line borde
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Sydenham dates this coin later than Crawford, to c 137-134 B.C.E, and indicates the mint of origin a...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is Quintus Minucius Rufus, legatus 110 and elder brother of the cons...
Crawford presumes the moneyer is Gnaeus Papirius Carbo, consul of 113. Sydenham dates this coin earl...
Crawford says the moneyer may plausibly be identified with the Praetor of Sicily, RE Papirius 39, me...
Badian identifies the control mark on the reverse as letter D. Crawford says the moneyer is the brot...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 103-102 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Crawford notes uncertainty about the moneyer, Gnaeus Domitius. If he is the Consul of 96, there is a...
Badian notes that Roma wears a necklace on the obverse. He also notes that the control mark on the r...
Crawford states that the moneyer, Marcus Sergius Silus, is not known to have progressed beyond the q...
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Sydenham dates this coin to 119-110 B.C.E. He identifies the togate figure on the left as either Luc...
Crawford identifies the moneyer of this type as likely to be the son of the moneyer Gaius Curiatius ...
According to Crawford, the moneyer is perhaps descended from Marcus Aburius, praetor of 176 (Crawfor...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Sydenham dates this coin later than Crawford, to c 137-134 B.C.E, and indicates the mint of origin a...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is Quintus Minucius Rufus, legatus 110 and elder brother of the cons...
Crawford presumes the moneyer is Gnaeus Papirius Carbo, consul of 113. Sydenham dates this coin earl...
Crawford says the moneyer may plausibly be identified with the Praetor of Sicily, RE Papirius 39, me...
Badian identifies the control mark on the reverse as letter D. Crawford says the moneyer is the brot...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 103-102 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Crawford notes uncertainty about the moneyer, Gnaeus Domitius. If he is the Consul of 96, there is a...
Badian notes that Roma wears a necklace on the obverse. He also notes that the control mark on the r...
Crawford states that the moneyer, Marcus Sergius Silus, is not known to have progressed beyond the q...
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Sydenham dates this coin to 119-110 B.C.E. He identifies the togate figure on the left as either Luc...
Crawford identifies the moneyer of this type as likely to be the son of the moneyer Gaius Curiatius ...
According to Crawford, the moneyer is perhaps descended from Marcus Aburius, praetor of 176 (Crawfor...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Sydenham dates this coin later than Crawford, to c 137-134 B.C.E, and indicates the mint of origin a...