Add to ORKGCrawford presumes the moneyer is Gnaeus Papirius Carbo, consul of 113. Sydenham dates this coin earlier than Crawford, to c 137-134 B.C.E, and indicates the mint of origin as 'auxiliary Italian' rather than Rome (p.48) and remarks on the coarse style of this type. Dr. Badian notes obverse image as Helmeted 'Roma' (in quotation marks)CARB ROMAHelmeted head of Roma to right, with curl on left shoulder; behind, value mark (X)Jupiter in quadriga to right, holding scepter and reins in left hand and hurling thunderbolt in right hand; below, CARB; in exergue, ROM
Sydenham dates this coin later than Crawford, to c 137-134 B.C.E, and indicates the mint of origin a...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...
Crawford says the moneyer may plausibly be identified with the Praetor of Sicily, RE Papirius 39, me...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is the son of Gaius Fannius, consul of 122, or possibly the son of G...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is Quintus Minucius Rufus, legatus 110 and elder brother of the cons...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 103-102 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Sydenham dates this coin to 133-126 B.C.E. He also posits the mint of origin as a local mint outside...
Crawford identifies the moneyer of this type as likely to be the son of the moneyer Gaius Curiatius ...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Crawford states that the moneyer, Marcus Sergius Silus, is not known to have progressed beyond the q...
Crawford notes uncertainty about the moneyer, Gnaeus Domitius. If he is the Consul of 96, there is a...
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Badian identifies the control mark on the reverse as letter D. Crawford says the moneyer is the brot...
Badian notes that Roma wears a necklace on the obverse. He also notes that the control mark on the r...
Sydenham dates this coin later than Crawford, to c 137-134 B.C.E, and indicates the mint of origin a...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...
Crawford says the moneyer may plausibly be identified with the Praetor of Sicily, RE Papirius 39, me...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is the son of Gaius Fannius, consul of 122, or possibly the son of G...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is Quintus Minucius Rufus, legatus 110 and elder brother of the cons...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 103-102 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Sydenham dates this coin to 133-126 B.C.E. He also posits the mint of origin as a local mint outside...
Crawford identifies the moneyer of this type as likely to be the son of the moneyer Gaius Curiatius ...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Crawford states that the moneyer, Marcus Sergius Silus, is not known to have progressed beyond the q...
Crawford notes uncertainty about the moneyer, Gnaeus Domitius. If he is the Consul of 96, there is a...
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Badian identifies the control mark on the reverse as letter D. Crawford says the moneyer is the brot...
Badian notes that Roma wears a necklace on the obverse. He also notes that the control mark on the r...
Sydenham dates this coin later than Crawford, to c 137-134 B.C.E, and indicates the mint of origin a...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...