Add to ORKGSydenham dates this coin later than Crawford, to c 137-134 B.C.E, and indicates the mint of origin as 'auxiliary Italian' rather than Rome (p.48) From Badian's note on this coin: N.B.: Erroneous descr. of rev. in RRC. Likely refers to the absence here of a reverse legend, of which Crawford makes no remark.C·ANTESTIROMAHelmeted head of Roma to right; before, value mark (X); behind, C·ANTESTI (ANTE ligatured)The Dioscuri to right; below, dog or puppy with fore feet raised; in exergue, ROM
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...
Badian notes that the reverse legend is in semi-exergue. Crawford says the moneyer is perhaps the so...
Crawford says the moneyer may plausibly be identified with the Praetor of Sicily, RE Papirius 39, me...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is Quintus Minucius Rufus, legatus 110 and elder brother of the cons...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is the son of Gaius Fannius, consul of 122, or possibly the son of G...
Crawford presumes the moneyer is Gnaeus Papirius Carbo, consul of 113. Sydenham dates this coin earl...
Sydenham notes two possible mints, one in northern Italy the other in Cisalpine Gaul, as opposed to ...
Badian notes that Roma wears a necklace on the obverse. He also notes that the control mark on the r...
Badian identifies the control mark on the reverse as letter D. Crawford says the moneyer is the brot...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. and believes the mint to have been located in cen...
Sydenham dates this coin to 133-126 B.C.E. He also posits the mint of origin as a local mint outside...
Sydenham includes this coin in Period IV series 18, dated between 133-126 B.C.E., at variance with C...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...
Badian notes that the reverse legend is in semi-exergue. Crawford says the moneyer is perhaps the so...
Crawford says the moneyer may plausibly be identified with the Praetor of Sicily, RE Papirius 39, me...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is Quintus Minucius Rufus, legatus 110 and elder brother of the cons...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is the son of Gaius Fannius, consul of 122, or possibly the son of G...
Crawford presumes the moneyer is Gnaeus Papirius Carbo, consul of 113. Sydenham dates this coin earl...
Sydenham notes two possible mints, one in northern Italy the other in Cisalpine Gaul, as opposed to ...
Badian notes that Roma wears a necklace on the obverse. He also notes that the control mark on the r...
Badian identifies the control mark on the reverse as letter D. Crawford says the moneyer is the brot...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. and believes the mint to have been located in cen...
Sydenham dates this coin to 133-126 B.C.E. He also posits the mint of origin as a local mint outside...
Sydenham includes this coin in Period IV series 18, dated between 133-126 B.C.E., at variance with C...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 109-107 B.C.E. He believes this series was minted in North Italy...
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Sydenham dates this coin to between 110-108 B.C.E. He believes the mint to have been located outside...