Figure S3. Number of OTUs and abundance of the genera that were analyze in Fig. 1. The left panel illustrates the winner prevalence of each genus (as reported in Fig. 1). The middle panel illustrates the number of OTUs in each group (after filtration of rare OTUs; see the “Methods” section), as well as the number of OTUs that have been lottery winners (> 90% of the group abundance) in at least one sample. Finally, the right panel illustrates the distribution of the overall group abundance across all samples in the American Gut data. (PDF 274 kb
Additional file 1: Figure S1. (A) Rarefaction curve analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA gene clone librari...
Figure S2. Relationship between the depth of sequencing and sum of the assembled contigs associated ...
Rarefaction based on known taxa. The figure shows the numbers of taxa calculated from samples of seq...
Figure S4. Distribution of within-group abundances for all genera when considering only the three mo...
Figure S2. Robustness of the winner prevalence estimate to different cutoffs. Bar plots show how the...
Figure S5. Distribution of within-group abundances for higher-level taxonomic groups. Details are as...
Figure S1. A conceptual illustration of the competitive lottery assembly model. In the first stage, ...
Figure S6. A taxonomic tree, with assembly parameters displayed as pie charts. On each group that wa...
Figure S7. Winner prevalence estimates in simulated groups at uniform abundance. Abundances have bee...
Figure S1. Diversity and abundance distribution of bacterial families in culture-independent or cult...
Comparison of the effect of OTU picking method on the proportion of OTUs cultured. Figure S2 Compari...
Figure S10. Violin plots showing distributions of abundant phyla. (A) Abundance and (B) logit-transf...
Figure S2. Dirichlet-Multinomial diagnostics including species level OTU relative abundance for each...
Table S1. PERMANOVA analysis used to assess microbial community structure differences. Table S2. Med...
The number of genomes of major genera exhibiting individual pathofunctions is displayed, where the p...
Additional file 1: Figure S1. (A) Rarefaction curve analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA gene clone librari...
Figure S2. Relationship between the depth of sequencing and sum of the assembled contigs associated ...
Rarefaction based on known taxa. The figure shows the numbers of taxa calculated from samples of seq...
Figure S4. Distribution of within-group abundances for all genera when considering only the three mo...
Figure S2. Robustness of the winner prevalence estimate to different cutoffs. Bar plots show how the...
Figure S5. Distribution of within-group abundances for higher-level taxonomic groups. Details are as...
Figure S1. A conceptual illustration of the competitive lottery assembly model. In the first stage, ...
Figure S6. A taxonomic tree, with assembly parameters displayed as pie charts. On each group that wa...
Figure S7. Winner prevalence estimates in simulated groups at uniform abundance. Abundances have bee...
Figure S1. Diversity and abundance distribution of bacterial families in culture-independent or cult...
Comparison of the effect of OTU picking method on the proportion of OTUs cultured. Figure S2 Compari...
Figure S10. Violin plots showing distributions of abundant phyla. (A) Abundance and (B) logit-transf...
Figure S2. Dirichlet-Multinomial diagnostics including species level OTU relative abundance for each...
Table S1. PERMANOVA analysis used to assess microbial community structure differences. Table S2. Med...
The number of genomes of major genera exhibiting individual pathofunctions is displayed, where the p...
Additional file 1: Figure S1. (A) Rarefaction curve analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA gene clone librari...
Figure S2. Relationship between the depth of sequencing and sum of the assembled contigs associated ...
Rarefaction based on known taxa. The figure shows the numbers of taxa calculated from samples of seq...