Figure S7. Winner prevalence estimates in simulated groups at uniform abundance. Abundances have been simulated using a Poisson distribution assuming that OTUs are at a variable minimum abundance threshold (x-axis). If abundance estimates were perfect, we would expect a winner prevalence of zero, but noise associated with the sampling processes creates artificial winners. The dashed red line is the minimum abundance threshold used in our study. (PDF 18 kb
Additional file 8: Heatmap showing the normalized abundances of major genera in the gut microbiomes ...
Proportions of most abundant bacterial families estimated from count data during hourly sampling per...
Model fits to the observed data. Posterior mean (red), 50% (dark blue) and 95% credible (light blue)...
Figure S2. Robustness of the winner prevalence estimate to different cutoffs. Bar plots show how the...
Figure S3. Number of OTUs and abundance of the genera that were analyze in Fig. 1. The left panel il...
Figure S1. A conceptual illustration of the competitive lottery assembly model. In the first stage, ...
Figure S4. Distribution of within-group abundances for all genera when considering only the three mo...
Figure S6. A taxonomic tree, with assembly parameters displayed as pie charts. On each group that wa...
Figure S5. Distribution of within-group abundances for higher-level taxonomic groups. Details are as...
Analysis of a toy simulated microbial community demonstrates the advantages of accounting for techni...
Figure S1. Diversity and abundance distribution of bacterial families in culture-independent or cult...
Figure S1. The gradient of selection in dependence on the fraction of cooperators for different excl...
Figure S10. Violin plots showing distributions of abundant phyla. (A) Abundance and (B) logit-transf...
Dynamics inferred in the balance between the Enterobacteriaceae and all other taxa does not correlat...
Additional file 3: Heatmap showing the normalized abundances of major genera in the gut microbiomes ...
Additional file 8: Heatmap showing the normalized abundances of major genera in the gut microbiomes ...
Proportions of most abundant bacterial families estimated from count data during hourly sampling per...
Model fits to the observed data. Posterior mean (red), 50% (dark blue) and 95% credible (light blue)...
Figure S2. Robustness of the winner prevalence estimate to different cutoffs. Bar plots show how the...
Figure S3. Number of OTUs and abundance of the genera that were analyze in Fig. 1. The left panel il...
Figure S1. A conceptual illustration of the competitive lottery assembly model. In the first stage, ...
Figure S4. Distribution of within-group abundances for all genera when considering only the three mo...
Figure S6. A taxonomic tree, with assembly parameters displayed as pie charts. On each group that wa...
Figure S5. Distribution of within-group abundances for higher-level taxonomic groups. Details are as...
Analysis of a toy simulated microbial community demonstrates the advantages of accounting for techni...
Figure S1. Diversity and abundance distribution of bacterial families in culture-independent or cult...
Figure S1. The gradient of selection in dependence on the fraction of cooperators for different excl...
Figure S10. Violin plots showing distributions of abundant phyla. (A) Abundance and (B) logit-transf...
Dynamics inferred in the balance between the Enterobacteriaceae and all other taxa does not correlat...
Additional file 3: Heatmap showing the normalized abundances of major genera in the gut microbiomes ...
Additional file 8: Heatmap showing the normalized abundances of major genera in the gut microbiomes ...
Proportions of most abundant bacterial families estimated from count data during hourly sampling per...
Model fits to the observed data. Posterior mean (red), 50% (dark blue) and 95% credible (light blue)...