Comparison between the weighted, unweighted, epigraph, and consensus candidates.</p
Weights of criteria if A1 is the best alternative (left) and A2 is the best alternative (right).</p
<p>A Comparison of Theme Endorsement by Treatment Completers and Treatment Dropouts.</p
<p>Comparison of linear mixed-effects models predicting weight from other measurable body parameters...
<p>The comparison of the real weights and the weights estimated from different methods.</p
<p>The comparison of objective weights using entropy method, standard deviation method, and CRITIC, ...
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Comparison between our proposed method and alternatives during the similar volatility period.</p
Comparison of the groups of participants with satisfactory (selected) versus unsatisfactory (filtere...
<p>Comparisons of the basic characteristics and clinical variables between the two groups.</p
Comparisons of clinical outcome between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
Subjective weight, objective weight, comprehensive weight and relative weight of sub-criteria cj.</p
<p>Comparison of the clinicopathological parameters between the study groups.</p
<p>Comparison of selected demographic and clinical variables between the groups.</p
Comparisons of the prosthesis type used between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
Comparison of m and d between different reconstructions and levels of temporal averaging.</p
Weights of criteria if A1 is the best alternative (left) and A2 is the best alternative (right).</p
<p>A Comparison of Theme Endorsement by Treatment Completers and Treatment Dropouts.</p
<p>Comparison of linear mixed-effects models predicting weight from other measurable body parameters...
<p>The comparison of the real weights and the weights estimated from different methods.</p
<p>The comparison of objective weights using entropy method, standard deviation method, and CRITIC, ...
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Comparison between our proposed method and alternatives during the similar volatility period.</p
Comparison of the groups of participants with satisfactory (selected) versus unsatisfactory (filtere...
<p>Comparisons of the basic characteristics and clinical variables between the two groups.</p
Comparisons of clinical outcome between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
Subjective weight, objective weight, comprehensive weight and relative weight of sub-criteria cj.</p
<p>Comparison of the clinicopathological parameters between the study groups.</p
<p>Comparison of selected demographic and clinical variables between the groups.</p
Comparisons of the prosthesis type used between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
Comparison of m and d between different reconstructions and levels of temporal averaging.</p
Weights of criteria if A1 is the best alternative (left) and A2 is the best alternative (right).</p
<p>A Comparison of Theme Endorsement by Treatment Completers and Treatment Dropouts.</p
<p>Comparison of linear mixed-effects models predicting weight from other measurable body parameters...
DOI
Add to ORKG