Comparison of the groups of participants with satisfactory (selected) versus unsatisfactory (filtered) models.</p
Comparison of clinical features among patients in the modeling and validation groups (% or range).</...
Characterization of participants included in the studies, according to the evaluated alternative.</p
<p>Comparison of the participants that were included vs. excluded from the study.</p
<p>Comparison of the time-to-event outcomes between the untested and tested groups.</p
<p>Comparison of participants who complete an acceptability questionnaire to those who didn't.</p
Comparisons of means and relative frequencies across outcome variables in the matched groups.</p
Comparison of model vs. human performance on the human test set (200 reports).</p
<p>Comparison of fit for univariate and multivariate models (with contrast effect).</p
Characteristics of the patients in the present study compared to both models used.</p
Comparison of unassisted and model-assisted performance metrics of clinical experts on the validatio...
<p>Comparison between standard fully adjusted models and non-linear models, according to goodness of...
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
Comparison between reliability and satisfaction of subjects between Condition 1 and Condition 2.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Comparison of clinical features among patients in the modeling and validation groups (% or range).</...
Characterization of participants included in the studies, according to the evaluated alternative.</p
<p>Comparison of the participants that were included vs. excluded from the study.</p
<p>Comparison of the time-to-event outcomes between the untested and tested groups.</p
<p>Comparison of participants who complete an acceptability questionnaire to those who didn't.</p
Comparisons of means and relative frequencies across outcome variables in the matched groups.</p
Comparison of model vs. human performance on the human test set (200 reports).</p
<p>Comparison of fit for univariate and multivariate models (with contrast effect).</p
Characteristics of the patients in the present study compared to both models used.</p
Comparison of unassisted and model-assisted performance metrics of clinical experts on the validatio...
<p>Comparison between standard fully adjusted models and non-linear models, according to goodness of...
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
Comparison between reliability and satisfaction of subjects between Condition 1 and Condition 2.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Comparison of clinical features among patients in the modeling and validation groups (% or range).</...
Characterization of participants included in the studies, according to the evaluated alternative.</p
<p>Comparison of the participants that were included vs. excluded from the study.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG