Comparison of m and d between different reconstructions and levels of temporal averaging.</p
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average MSSIM value for the test images.</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
Comparison between activation levels in autobiographical memory and self-reflection conditions.</p
Results of statistical comparisons between time-windows for the tested conditions of vibration.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p
Comparison of absolute amplitude error of measured and estimated for each model.</p
Comparison of peak discharge between observed and projected GCMs for different return periods.</p
<p>Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and S...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
Comparison of the flooded area between observed and projected GCMs for different return periods.</p
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average PSNR value for the test images.</p
Comparison between mean percentage change from baseline (95% confidence interval of difference) at d...
<p>A comparison between model relative peak heights and measured relative peak heights.</p
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average MSSIM value for the test images.</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
Comparison between activation levels in autobiographical memory and self-reflection conditions.</p
Results of statistical comparisons between time-windows for the tested conditions of vibration.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p
Comparison of absolute amplitude error of measured and estimated for each model.</p
Comparison of peak discharge between observed and projected GCMs for different return periods.</p
<p>Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and S...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
Comparison of the flooded area between observed and projected GCMs for different return periods.</p
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average PSNR value for the test images.</p
Comparison between mean percentage change from baseline (95% confidence interval of difference) at d...
<p>A comparison between model relative peak heights and measured relative peak heights.</p
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average MSSIM value for the test images.</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
Comparison between activation levels in autobiographical memory and self-reflection conditions.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG