<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Comparison of different polices at the same arrival intensity the two classes of customers.</p
<p>Comparison of ITS1 profiles of specimens of the same strain and of different strains.</p
<p>Comparison of fit for univariate and multivariate models (with contrast effect).</p
<p>The comparison of the real weights and the weights estimated from different methods.</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
<p>A comparison between model relative peak heights and measured relative peak heights.</p
<p>The weight parameters derived from the comparison of the model simulations and the experimental r...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
<p>Comparisons of the basic characteristics and clinical variables between the two groups.</p
Comparison of absolute amplitude error of measured and estimated for each model.</p
Comparison of the average correct answer positions among different model setups.</p
<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p
<p>Measurement comparison between the hands-on method and the proposed method.</p
<p>Comparison of the reference values provided by manufacturer and by our research.</p
Comparison of different polices at the same arrival intensity the two classes of customers.</p
<p>Comparison of ITS1 profiles of specimens of the same strain and of different strains.</p
<p>Comparison of fit for univariate and multivariate models (with contrast effect).</p
<p>The comparison of the real weights and the weights estimated from different methods.</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
<p>A comparison between model relative peak heights and measured relative peak heights.</p
<p>The weight parameters derived from the comparison of the model simulations and the experimental r...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
<p>Comparisons of the basic characteristics and clinical variables between the two groups.</p
Comparison of absolute amplitude error of measured and estimated for each model.</p
Comparison of the average correct answer positions among different model setups.</p
<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p
<p>Measurement comparison between the hands-on method and the proposed method.</p
<p>Comparison of the reference values provided by manufacturer and by our research.</p
Comparison of different polices at the same arrival intensity the two classes of customers.</p
<p>Comparison of ITS1 profiles of specimens of the same strain and of different strains.</p
<p>Comparison of fit for univariate and multivariate models (with contrast effect).</p
DOI
Add to ORKG