Add to ORKGThe ongoing debate over mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) continues, despite COOL being passed as part of the 2002 Farm Bill and plans for it to become a mandatory program on September 30, 2004. As the discussion surrounding COOL intensifies, it is clear that there is still much contention regarding implementation of the mandatory COOL provisions
H.R. 2744, USDA’s FY2006 appropriation, again postpones rules requiring many retailers to provide co...
commodities—beef, pork, lamb, fish and shellfish, fruits and vegetables, and peanuts—sold at the ret...
Since 1949, the Farm Bill has been updated every four to six years to reflect the evolving needs of ...
The ongoing debate over mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) continues, despite COOL being pa...
Another step in the multi-year development and implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) w...
Labeling meat and other perishable agricultural products was vigorously debated prior to the approva...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...
Public Law 107-171 of the U.S. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 required country-of-or...
The Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) provisions in the 2002 Farm Bill require, beginning September ...
commodity and conservation programs and how they had changed relative to the 1996 Farm Bill. However...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
This revision is dated May 23, 2003.The 2002 Farm Bill contained a controversial provision mandating...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
The COOL (Country of Origing Labelling) measure is a US internal measure, as opposed to a customs or...
H.R. 2744, USDA’s FY2006 appropriation, again postpones rules requiring many retailers to provide co...
commodities—beef, pork, lamb, fish and shellfish, fruits and vegetables, and peanuts—sold at the ret...
Since 1949, the Farm Bill has been updated every four to six years to reflect the evolving needs of ...
The ongoing debate over mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) continues, despite COOL being pa...
Another step in the multi-year development and implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) w...
Labeling meat and other perishable agricultural products was vigorously debated prior to the approva...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...
Public Law 107-171 of the U.S. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 required country-of-or...
The Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) provisions in the 2002 Farm Bill require, beginning September ...
commodity and conservation programs and how they had changed relative to the 1996 Farm Bill. However...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
This revision is dated May 23, 2003.The 2002 Farm Bill contained a controversial provision mandating...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
The COOL (Country of Origing Labelling) measure is a US internal measure, as opposed to a customs or...
H.R. 2744, USDA’s FY2006 appropriation, again postpones rules requiring many retailers to provide co...
commodities—beef, pork, lamb, fish and shellfish, fruits and vegetables, and peanuts—sold at the ret...
Since 1949, the Farm Bill has been updated every four to six years to reflect the evolving needs of ...