Another step in the multi-year development and implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) was completed at the end of October when USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published proposed rules for mandatory COOL. These proposed rules, published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2003, provided AMS’s requirements for compliance with COOL and clarification of some issues raised through public comment on the voluntary COOL guidelines released last year. Additionally, AMS offered a summary of research identifying costs and benefits of the program and its own cost assessment
A provision of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 requires country of origin labeling (C...
Although several studies have estimated the costs of country-of-origin labeling (COOL), no previous ...
Concerns over the total costs assessed to the beef industry from the implementation of mandatory cou...
Another step in the multi-year development and implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) w...
The ongoing debate over mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) continues, despite COOL being pa...
Labeling meat and other perishable agricultural products was vigorously debated prior to the approva...
The Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) provisions in the 2002 Farm Bill require, beginning September ...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
Public Law 107-171 of the U.S. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 required country-of-or...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...
The much anticipated and hotly debated Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) provision of the 2002 Farm ...
This revision is dated May 23, 2003.The 2002 Farm Bill contained a controversial provision mandating...
commodity and conservation programs and how they had changed relative to the 1996 Farm Bill. However...
H.R. 2744, USDA’s FY2006 appropriation, again postpones rules requiring many retailers to provide co...
A provision of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 requires country of origin labeling (C...
Although several studies have estimated the costs of country-of-origin labeling (COOL), no previous ...
Concerns over the total costs assessed to the beef industry from the implementation of mandatory cou...
Another step in the multi-year development and implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) w...
The ongoing debate over mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) continues, despite COOL being pa...
Labeling meat and other perishable agricultural products was vigorously debated prior to the approva...
The Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) provisions in the 2002 Farm Bill require, beginning September ...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
Public Law 107-171 of the U.S. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 required country-of-or...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...
The much anticipated and hotly debated Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) provision of the 2002 Farm ...
This revision is dated May 23, 2003.The 2002 Farm Bill contained a controversial provision mandating...
commodity and conservation programs and how they had changed relative to the 1996 Farm Bill. However...
H.R. 2744, USDA’s FY2006 appropriation, again postpones rules requiring many retailers to provide co...
A provision of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 requires country of origin labeling (C...
Although several studies have estimated the costs of country-of-origin labeling (COOL), no previous ...
Concerns over the total costs assessed to the beef industry from the implementation of mandatory cou...