In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the scientific process as a whole. But few reviewers are provided with any training or mentoring on how to undertake a review. Hugh McLaughlin offers clarification on the process and the objective of peer review feedback and stresses the need for specific critical analysis for authors, which should be done in a supportive manner
Peer review is a mainstay of scientific publishing and, while peer reviewers and scientists r...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
From today's viewpoint it seems almost inconceivable that there once was a time where academia funct...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
Objective: To describe the process of scientific peer review as it is used in the manuscript submiss...
Objective: To describe the process of scientific peer review as it is used in the manuscript submiss...
Peer review not only helps to maintain The quality and integrity of literature in your field, it’s k...
Objective: To describe the process of scientific peer review as it is used in the manuscript submiss...
Peer reviewers plays a crucial for scientific journals today. The review process is a critical view ...
Peer review is a mainstay of scientific publishing and, while peer reviewers and scientists r...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
From today's viewpoint it seems almost inconceivable that there once was a time where academia funct...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
Objective: To describe the process of scientific peer review as it is used in the manuscript submiss...
Objective: To describe the process of scientific peer review as it is used in the manuscript submiss...
Peer review not only helps to maintain The quality and integrity of literature in your field, it’s k...
Objective: To describe the process of scientific peer review as it is used in the manuscript submiss...
Peer reviewers plays a crucial for scientific journals today. The review process is a critical view ...
Peer review is a mainstay of scientific publishing and, while peer reviewers and scientists r...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
From today's viewpoint it seems almost inconceivable that there once was a time where academia funct...