Peer reviewers plays a crucial for scientific journals today. The review process is a critical view on the submitted work and should be evaluated by peers within the same scientific area. The experts perform this task outside normal working hours and will typically receive no compensation. The task is to improve the articles’ quality prior to publication. The objective of this tutorial is to describe the peer reviewer process and provide a practical framework for current and future peer reviewers
Peer reviewed manuscripts contain a certain level of merit, as they have survived the scrutiny of re...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...
<div>Peer review is a process in which academic research is subjected to critical evaluation by othe...
Peer review is the process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scruti...
The publication process of a scientific article in a journal is a demanding and often lengthy proces...
The quality of an article is a critical parameter for the success of any scholarly journal, and the ...
Peer review of journal articles is now the norm in virtually all scientific disciplines. The art of ...
This presentation is intended for all researchers, who publish scientific papers. By default, publis...
Peer review is a practice used in the evaluation of scientific and scholarly papers in order to sele...
Peer review is a critical part of the publishing process at JM3, as it is for most science journals....
Peer-review is an essential activity for the vast majority of credited scientific journals and repre...
Typically, in scientific publications, peer review processes are used to maintain the quality standa...
The strength and vitality of publications in our pro-fession and pharmaceutical science disciplines ...
ost scientists acquire their training in manuscript review not through instruction but by actually d...
Peer reviewed manuscripts contain a certain level of merit, as they have survived the scrutiny of re...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...
<div>Peer review is a process in which academic research is subjected to critical evaluation by othe...
Peer review is the process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scruti...
The publication process of a scientific article in a journal is a demanding and often lengthy proces...
The quality of an article is a critical parameter for the success of any scholarly journal, and the ...
Peer review of journal articles is now the norm in virtually all scientific disciplines. The art of ...
This presentation is intended for all researchers, who publish scientific papers. By default, publis...
Peer review is a practice used in the evaluation of scientific and scholarly papers in order to sele...
Peer review is a critical part of the publishing process at JM3, as it is for most science journals....
Peer-review is an essential activity for the vast majority of credited scientific journals and repre...
Typically, in scientific publications, peer review processes are used to maintain the quality standa...
The strength and vitality of publications in our pro-fession and pharmaceutical science disciplines ...
ost scientists acquire their training in manuscript review not through instruction but by actually d...
Peer reviewed manuscripts contain a certain level of merit, as they have survived the scrutiny of re...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...