In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the scientific process as a whole. But few reviewers are provided with any training or mentoring on how to undertake a review. Hugh McLaughlin offers clarification on the process and the objective of peer review feedback and stresses the need for specific critical analysis for authors, which should be done in a supportive manner
Despite the massive changes in academic publishing in recent years, one thing remains more or less c...
Graduate students develop their researcher identity through their written academic work, not only vo...
Peer review not only helps to maintain The quality and integrity of literature in your field, it’s k...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
Peer review is key in academic publishing, and rejection (or at least being asked to resubmit your p...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
Abstract In one of our past year’s editorials, we discussed the (critical) role played by reviewers...
The peer review process can be challenging. In this essay, the journal’s editor and editorial assist...
The quality assurance of research articles is based on a widespread reliance on peer review, which h...
Despite the massive changes in academic publishing in recent years, one thing remains more or less c...
Graduate students develop their researcher identity through their written academic work, not only vo...
Peer review not only helps to maintain The quality and integrity of literature in your field, it’s k...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
Peer review is key in academic publishing, and rejection (or at least being asked to resubmit your p...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
Abstract In one of our past year’s editorials, we discussed the (critical) role played by reviewers...
The peer review process can be challenging. In this essay, the journal’s editor and editorial assist...
The quality assurance of research articles is based on a widespread reliance on peer review, which h...
Despite the massive changes in academic publishing in recent years, one thing remains more or less c...
Graduate students develop their researcher identity through their written academic work, not only vo...
Peer review not only helps to maintain The quality and integrity of literature in your field, it’s k...