a<p>Number of parameters.</p>b<p>Only positively selected sites with a posterior probability equal or greater than 95% were indicated by the Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) approach.</p
<p>A likelihood ratio test (LRT) was performed to compare the likelihood scores (lnL) of the two nes...
a<p>Twice the difference between the log likelihood of M0 (one ratio) and two ratio model.</p>b<p><i...
<p><sup>a</sup>np, number of parameters.</p><p><sup>b</sup>LRT, likelihood ratio test.</p><p><sup>c<...
<p><b>Note:</b><i>P</i> number of parameters in the <i>ω</i> distribution, <i>K</i> estimated transi...
<p>lnL, the log-likelihood difference between the two models; 2Δl, twice the log-likelihood differen...
<p>Note.— <i>p</i>: Number of parameters including 15 branch lengths in the tree (<a href="http://ww...
<p>We divide binding sites for each TF into two groups: those regulating essential genes and those r...
<p>Note: np number of parameters, ln<i>L</i> ln[likelihood] value, 2Δ(ln<i>L</i>) twice the differen...
1<p>Number of parameters.</p>2<p>Twice the difference of ln [likelihood] between the two models comp...
<p>Positive selected sites were identified using empirical Bayes procedure. Sites inferred under sel...
<p>Notes: positively selected sites with significance at the 99% level are bold, whereas the remaini...
<p>Amino acids from chicken Mystran, Trojan and Thracian with Bayesian posterior probabilities to be...
<p>The likelihood values and the respective estimated parameters are shown for each model. The ω rat...
<p>−2Δ<i>L</i>, likelihood ratio test to detect positive selection; p: proportion of sites under pos...
a<p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0062307#pone-0062307-g...
<p>A likelihood ratio test (LRT) was performed to compare the likelihood scores (lnL) of the two nes...
a<p>Twice the difference between the log likelihood of M0 (one ratio) and two ratio model.</p>b<p><i...
<p><sup>a</sup>np, number of parameters.</p><p><sup>b</sup>LRT, likelihood ratio test.</p><p><sup>c<...
<p><b>Note:</b><i>P</i> number of parameters in the <i>ω</i> distribution, <i>K</i> estimated transi...
<p>lnL, the log-likelihood difference between the two models; 2Δl, twice the log-likelihood differen...
<p>Note.— <i>p</i>: Number of parameters including 15 branch lengths in the tree (<a href="http://ww...
<p>We divide binding sites for each TF into two groups: those regulating essential genes and those r...
<p>Note: np number of parameters, ln<i>L</i> ln[likelihood] value, 2Δ(ln<i>L</i>) twice the differen...
1<p>Number of parameters.</p>2<p>Twice the difference of ln [likelihood] between the two models comp...
<p>Positive selected sites were identified using empirical Bayes procedure. Sites inferred under sel...
<p>Notes: positively selected sites with significance at the 99% level are bold, whereas the remaini...
<p>Amino acids from chicken Mystran, Trojan and Thracian with Bayesian posterior probabilities to be...
<p>The likelihood values and the respective estimated parameters are shown for each model. The ω rat...
<p>−2Δ<i>L</i>, likelihood ratio test to detect positive selection; p: proportion of sites under pos...
a<p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0062307#pone-0062307-g...
<p>A likelihood ratio test (LRT) was performed to compare the likelihood scores (lnL) of the two nes...
a<p>Twice the difference between the log likelihood of M0 (one ratio) and two ratio model.</p>b<p><i...
<p><sup>a</sup>np, number of parameters.</p><p><sup>b</sup>LRT, likelihood ratio test.</p><p><sup>c<...
DOI
Add to ORKG