<p><i>A</i>, Gene expression fold changes indicated by microarray and qPCR. Eighteen genes (listed on the figure's left) were selected from the synapse, FGF, and unclustered categories for qPCR validation. Array and qPCR fold change values were calculated for each gene for the comparisons, <i>5-day-Reach</i> versus <i>0-day, 5-day-Reach</i> versus <i>5-day-Sham</i>, and <i>5-day-Reach</i> versus <i>12-day-Reach</i>, resulting into a total of 18×3 = 54 comparisons. The extent of agreement between the direction of fold change values derived from the two methods was assessed by the ratio of qPCR-fold change to the array-fold change. A positive ratio indicates an agreement, and a negative ratio, a disagreement. The heat map on the left shows th...
<p>A) Relative expression distribution (Y-axis) of ten selected genes is shown as a ratio comparing ...
<p>The experiment was carried out using biological triplicates and the values are presented as log2F...
<p>Five of regulated genes were representatively selected for validation of their expression levels ...
<p>Log ratio of microarray fold change expression of the selected 20 up and down regulated genes ass...
<p>A. Validation of gene expression changes by qPCR The expression profiles of seven representative ...
<p>The same RNA used for Agilent microarrays was examined by QRTPCR. All fold changes were calculate...
<p>Bars represent the mean ± SD of fold change relative to growth medium control. At least 3 indepen...
<p>qPCR analysis was performed on 7 genes to confirm the transcript abundance seen with the microarr...
<p>Selection of target genes for qPCR validation, among the 147 differentially expressed soybean gen...
<p>Table shows fold changes (FC) and P values (for qPCR data) or false discovery rates (FDR; for mic...
<p>The green bars represent gene expression quantities of control and DEHP-treatment groups microarr...
<p>For the evaluation, we selected the most highly expressed genes involved in both DNA damage and p...
<p>QPCR data indicated as mean ± SD, where * indicates p<0.05, and ** indicates p<0.01.</p><p>The ex...
<p>Gene expression levels as determined by qPCR (Rn) in normothermic (NT) and hyperthermic (HT) anim...
<p>NA- not available</p><p>A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.67 was obtained when comparing the...
<p>A) Relative expression distribution (Y-axis) of ten selected genes is shown as a ratio comparing ...
<p>The experiment was carried out using biological triplicates and the values are presented as log2F...
<p>Five of regulated genes were representatively selected for validation of their expression levels ...
<p>Log ratio of microarray fold change expression of the selected 20 up and down regulated genes ass...
<p>A. Validation of gene expression changes by qPCR The expression profiles of seven representative ...
<p>The same RNA used for Agilent microarrays was examined by QRTPCR. All fold changes were calculate...
<p>Bars represent the mean ± SD of fold change relative to growth medium control. At least 3 indepen...
<p>qPCR analysis was performed on 7 genes to confirm the transcript abundance seen with the microarr...
<p>Selection of target genes for qPCR validation, among the 147 differentially expressed soybean gen...
<p>Table shows fold changes (FC) and P values (for qPCR data) or false discovery rates (FDR; for mic...
<p>The green bars represent gene expression quantities of control and DEHP-treatment groups microarr...
<p>For the evaluation, we selected the most highly expressed genes involved in both DNA damage and p...
<p>QPCR data indicated as mean ± SD, where * indicates p<0.05, and ** indicates p<0.01.</p><p>The ex...
<p>Gene expression levels as determined by qPCR (Rn) in normothermic (NT) and hyperthermic (HT) anim...
<p>NA- not available</p><p>A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.67 was obtained when comparing the...
<p>A) Relative expression distribution (Y-axis) of ten selected genes is shown as a ratio comparing ...
<p>The experiment was carried out using biological triplicates and the values are presented as log2F...
<p>Five of regulated genes were representatively selected for validation of their expression levels ...