<p>Powers are calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous traits (upper) and continuous trait (lower). Power was evaluated for <i>I</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>I</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>p</i>*, SKAT, SKATint, VT, RB, WS and CMC. Scenarios with different sample sizes were considered. P-values were estimated using 10,000 permutations and power was evaluated using 1,000 replicates.</p
<p>Each box corresponds to a different proportion of causal variants involved in the relationship be...
<p>Results in Figures A and B show the effect of having both deleterious and protective rare variant...
<p>Each box corresponds to a different proportion of causal variants involved in the relationship be...
<p>Powers are calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous traits...
<p>Powers are calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous traits...
<p>Powers were calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous trait...
<p>Powers were calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous trait...
a<p>Indices of the interaction SNPs in the two loci (<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/in...
<p><b>A</b>. Assuming no main effect at both loci (<i>OR<sub>G</sub></i> = <i>OR<sub>H</sub></i> = 1...
<p>The figure shows the empirical power given the significance level of 0.05. Top row: 50 variants i...
<p>For each plot, the <i>x</i>-axis shows a threshold, <i>t</i>, for power to detect an interaction ...
<p>The <i>Latent</i> column is the power with the proposed method applied to 6 latent phenotypes. Th...
<p>Power is calculated for CMC, WSS, KBAC, VT, and SKAT implemented in STAR framework. Secondary tra...
<p>The figure shows the empirical power given the significance level of 0.05. Top row: 50 variants i...
<p>In each simulation, a total of 10,000 summary association statistics were generated for eight tra...
<p>Each box corresponds to a different proportion of causal variants involved in the relationship be...
<p>Results in Figures A and B show the effect of having both deleterious and protective rare variant...
<p>Each box corresponds to a different proportion of causal variants involved in the relationship be...
<p>Powers are calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous traits...
<p>Powers are calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous traits...
<p>Powers were calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous trait...
<p>Powers were calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous trait...
a<p>Indices of the interaction SNPs in the two loci (<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/in...
<p><b>A</b>. Assuming no main effect at both loci (<i>OR<sub>G</sub></i> = <i>OR<sub>H</sub></i> = 1...
<p>The figure shows the empirical power given the significance level of 0.05. Top row: 50 variants i...
<p>For each plot, the <i>x</i>-axis shows a threshold, <i>t</i>, for power to detect an interaction ...
<p>The <i>Latent</i> column is the power with the proposed method applied to 6 latent phenotypes. Th...
<p>Power is calculated for CMC, WSS, KBAC, VT, and SKAT implemented in STAR framework. Secondary tra...
<p>The figure shows the empirical power given the significance level of 0.05. Top row: 50 variants i...
<p>In each simulation, a total of 10,000 summary association statistics were generated for eight tra...
<p>Each box corresponds to a different proportion of causal variants involved in the relationship be...
<p>Results in Figures A and B show the effect of having both deleterious and protective rare variant...
<p>Each box corresponds to a different proportion of causal variants involved in the relationship be...