Appendix. Figure A-1: Column 1 to 4 represent four different cases: first two columns are from histologically normal tissue and the last two are from cancerous tissue of the same patient. Rows 1 to 4 represent pseudo-color images obtained after applying low rank normalization protocols as marked by the experts. Figure A-2: Within class KL-divergence for Patient 2. Within class KL-divergence for second patient after performing phenotyping using different normalization protocols. Figure A-3: Between class KL-divergence for Patient 2. Between class KL-divergence for second patient after performing phenotyping using different normalization protocols. (PDF 341 kb
Figure S1. Illustration of the influence of logistic model parameters on curve, and the model fitted...
Figure S1. Comparison of normalized coverage of targeted capture-based NGS to multiplex PCR-based NG...
Schematic representation of process for TIL initiation, expansion and testing. Figure S2. Lymphocyti...
Ahmed Raza SE, Langenkämper D, Sirinukunwattana K, Epstein D, Nattkemper TW, Rajpoot NM. Robust norm...
Figure S1. Impact of quantification scale. Left panels display the mean decrease accuracy of textura...
Figure S2. Impact of voxels post-reconstruction resampling. Left panels display the mean decrease ac...
Figure S3. Comparison of community classifications from each reconciliation method with intrinsic br...
Density distribution of β values for all normalisation methods. Density plots of β values for vari...
Frequency of indels and non-indels in each MAF dataset. Distribution of mutation frequency across MA...
Figure S1. Box and whisker plots showing tumor-to-background ratio distributions obtained from lesio...
Supplemental data for illustrating the differentiation blockade in the hematopoietic cascade. (A). A...
Figure S2. Scatterplot of normalization factors for each pair of scaling methods. Normalization fact...
Supplementary material for the main manuscript. (S1) FoCo algorithm; (S2) H-maxima transform; (S3) O...
Model fits to the observed data. Posterior mean (red), 50% (dark blue) and 95% credible (light blue)...
Figure S4. Silhouette width of each sample and community in breast cancer for each reconciliation me...
Figure S1. Illustration of the influence of logistic model parameters on curve, and the model fitted...
Figure S1. Comparison of normalized coverage of targeted capture-based NGS to multiplex PCR-based NG...
Schematic representation of process for TIL initiation, expansion and testing. Figure S2. Lymphocyti...
Ahmed Raza SE, Langenkämper D, Sirinukunwattana K, Epstein D, Nattkemper TW, Rajpoot NM. Robust norm...
Figure S1. Impact of quantification scale. Left panels display the mean decrease accuracy of textura...
Figure S2. Impact of voxels post-reconstruction resampling. Left panels display the mean decrease ac...
Figure S3. Comparison of community classifications from each reconciliation method with intrinsic br...
Density distribution of β values for all normalisation methods. Density plots of β values for vari...
Frequency of indels and non-indels in each MAF dataset. Distribution of mutation frequency across MA...
Figure S1. Box and whisker plots showing tumor-to-background ratio distributions obtained from lesio...
Supplemental data for illustrating the differentiation blockade in the hematopoietic cascade. (A). A...
Figure S2. Scatterplot of normalization factors for each pair of scaling methods. Normalization fact...
Supplementary material for the main manuscript. (S1) FoCo algorithm; (S2) H-maxima transform; (S3) O...
Model fits to the observed data. Posterior mean (red), 50% (dark blue) and 95% credible (light blue)...
Figure S4. Silhouette width of each sample and community in breast cancer for each reconciliation me...
Figure S1. Illustration of the influence of logistic model parameters on curve, and the model fitted...
Figure S1. Comparison of normalized coverage of targeted capture-based NGS to multiplex PCR-based NG...
Schematic representation of process for TIL initiation, expansion and testing. Figure S2. Lymphocyti...