Frequency of indels and non-indels in each MAF dataset. Distribution of mutation frequency across MAFs for indel variants (upper) and non-indel variants (lower). *, MAF datasets with no indels are indicated. Figure S2. Number of MAF data for each cancer type. Bar plot shows the number of MAF datasets available for each TCGA cancer type. Figure S3. Homopolymer runs in the flanking sequences of the batch-biased indels. Distribution of long (red) and short (blue) homopolymer runs for each altered nucleotide (A, T, G and C) within the 50 nucleotide sequences flanking each variant, shown for batch-biased indel variants (upper) and unbiased indel variants (lower). Figure S4. Consensus sequences in flanking sequences of batch-biased indels. The se...
Figure S2. Comparison of biological pathway between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) The perce...
Figure S1. Comparison of mutant read proportions for substitutions at each nucleotide position acros...
Figure S1. MammaSeq⢠gene coverage. The percentage of protein coding bases pairs in each gene that...
List of the MAFs used in the analysis. Table S2. List of 999 batch-biased variants in TCGA data. Tab...
Relative frequencies of non-coding mutation contexts in different cancer types. (top panel) Three ca...
Log10 of total mutations per genome, ordered by median mutations within each tumour type. Figure S2:...
Figure S1. Comparison of somatic mutation frequency between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) T...
Allele frequency for non-reproducible false positive variants. Allele frequency (VF â x axis) is p...
Batch effects correction. Description: 104 tumor and 11 normal samples were sequenced in different b...
Figure S1. Test of the Poisson distribution of nonsense mutations in URA3. Figure S2. The effect of ...
Large tumor dataset quality control metrics. A. Principal component analysis and B. loadings using s...
Figure A. Illustration of MMC response and pathway mutation association testing. Figure B. Barplot o...
Supplementary Figures S1-S13. Figure S1. Comparison of mutant allele fraction (MAF) in diluted sampl...
Table S7. Mean coverage achieved by Agilent SureSelect and Roche NimbleGen libraries within 90 PCR-c...
Figure S1. a–c The distribution of Tajima’s D for DNase footprint SNPs in each subpopulation. d Over...
Figure S2. Comparison of biological pathway between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) The perce...
Figure S1. Comparison of mutant read proportions for substitutions at each nucleotide position acros...
Figure S1. MammaSeq⢠gene coverage. The percentage of protein coding bases pairs in each gene that...
List of the MAFs used in the analysis. Table S2. List of 999 batch-biased variants in TCGA data. Tab...
Relative frequencies of non-coding mutation contexts in different cancer types. (top panel) Three ca...
Log10 of total mutations per genome, ordered by median mutations within each tumour type. Figure S2:...
Figure S1. Comparison of somatic mutation frequency between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) T...
Allele frequency for non-reproducible false positive variants. Allele frequency (VF â x axis) is p...
Batch effects correction. Description: 104 tumor and 11 normal samples were sequenced in different b...
Figure S1. Test of the Poisson distribution of nonsense mutations in URA3. Figure S2. The effect of ...
Large tumor dataset quality control metrics. A. Principal component analysis and B. loadings using s...
Figure A. Illustration of MMC response and pathway mutation association testing. Figure B. Barplot o...
Supplementary Figures S1-S13. Figure S1. Comparison of mutant allele fraction (MAF) in diluted sampl...
Table S7. Mean coverage achieved by Agilent SureSelect and Roche NimbleGen libraries within 90 PCR-c...
Figure S1. a–c The distribution of Tajima’s D for DNase footprint SNPs in each subpopulation. d Over...
Figure S2. Comparison of biological pathway between IBC and non-IBC in four subgroups. (a) The perce...
Figure S1. Comparison of mutant read proportions for substitutions at each nucleotide position acros...
Figure S1. MammaSeq⢠gene coverage. The percentage of protein coding bases pairs in each gene that...