Figure S1. Illustration of the influence of logistic model parameters on curve, and the model fitted to a CKC. From left to right: Îą defines the asymmetry of the logistic model, Ď the steepness of the curve and k influences the terminal slope. The regression curve fitted to a given CKC for a malignant (blue) and a benign lesion (green). Figure S2. Boxplot of automatic segmentation performance in terms of Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; GI, Gini Importance; mRMR, minimum-Redundancy-Maximum-Relevance; PET, positron emission tomography; w/o, without. (DOCX 219 kb
Figure S1. Box and whisker plots showing tumor-to-background ratio distributions obtained from lesio...
Estimated odds of tumor development in the four quadrants. Based on GEE modeling, there was a statis...
Figure S1. Example photomicrographs of HER2-IHC. Images depict scoring categories 1+, 2+ and 3+ at m...
Figure S2. Impact of voxels post-reconstruction resampling. Left panels display the mean decrease ac...
Figure S1. Impact of quantification scale. Left panels display the mean decrease accuracy of textura...
Figure S1. a Examples of percent mammographic density (and grey scale). A = 0%; B = < 10%; C = 10 < ...
Supplementary Figures and Tables. This file contains the following figures and tables: Validation of...
Separate plots are provided for copy number comparisons of all pairs of lesions ascertained in the s...
Table S1. P values end effect sizes r from post hoc analysis for histologic and molecular genetic di...
Genomic Identification of Significant Targets (GISTIC) outputs for Circular Binary Segmentation (CBS...
Figure S1. Details of SVM BRCA1-like classifier. (A) Overview of copy number mapping algorithm for g...
Table S1. For interval and screen-detected invasive breast cancer, marginal risk estimates for Cumul...
Table S1. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis combining features of chest computed tomo...
Figure S1. Flowcharts of detailed patient selection for both TCGA and I-SPY 1 trials in the proposed...
Density residual: description of methods. Appendix 2: Table S1. Univariate and multivariate performa...
Figure S1. Box and whisker plots showing tumor-to-background ratio distributions obtained from lesio...
Estimated odds of tumor development in the four quadrants. Based on GEE modeling, there was a statis...
Figure S1. Example photomicrographs of HER2-IHC. Images depict scoring categories 1+, 2+ and 3+ at m...
Figure S2. Impact of voxels post-reconstruction resampling. Left panels display the mean decrease ac...
Figure S1. Impact of quantification scale. Left panels display the mean decrease accuracy of textura...
Figure S1. a Examples of percent mammographic density (and grey scale). A = 0%; B = < 10%; C = 10 < ...
Supplementary Figures and Tables. This file contains the following figures and tables: Validation of...
Separate plots are provided for copy number comparisons of all pairs of lesions ascertained in the s...
Table S1. P values end effect sizes r from post hoc analysis for histologic and molecular genetic di...
Genomic Identification of Significant Targets (GISTIC) outputs for Circular Binary Segmentation (CBS...
Figure S1. Details of SVM BRCA1-like classifier. (A) Overview of copy number mapping algorithm for g...
Table S1. For interval and screen-detected invasive breast cancer, marginal risk estimates for Cumul...
Table S1. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis combining features of chest computed tomo...
Figure S1. Flowcharts of detailed patient selection for both TCGA and I-SPY 1 trials in the proposed...
Density residual: description of methods. Appendix 2: Table S1. Univariate and multivariate performa...
Figure S1. Box and whisker plots showing tumor-to-background ratio distributions obtained from lesio...
Estimated odds of tumor development in the four quadrants. Based on GEE modeling, there was a statis...
Figure S1. Example photomicrographs of HER2-IHC. Images depict scoring categories 1+, 2+ and 3+ at m...