<p>Comparison of the FQ grades as evaluated by both methods with the crop yield grades.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
<p>The comparison of the real weights and the weights estimated from different methods.</p
<p>Comparisons where organic area was greater than 50% of total area reported.</p
Comparison between the results obtained from analytical calculations and the FFD method.</p
<p>Rationality test of the area consistency rate between the FQ evaluation grades and the crop yield...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
<p>Comparisons of simulated and measured SSA under different cultivars and N rates.</p
<p>Comparison of regression methods relative to their ability to handle different types of data prob...
b: Correlation of growth parameters to each other and to yield in the varieties.</p
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
Comparison of ranking of CSA practices between farm profitability and aggregate profitability.</p
<p>Comparison between the computed and measured discharge, using the different methods.</p
Comparison of the proposed method with other conventional methods for throughput of each class.</p
<p>Comparisons of the performances of different methods by MCCs [Average difference (P value)].</p
Comparison of the performance of the four methods under the four distributions data.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
<p>The comparison of the real weights and the weights estimated from different methods.</p
<p>Comparisons where organic area was greater than 50% of total area reported.</p
Comparison between the results obtained from analytical calculations and the FFD method.</p
<p>Rationality test of the area consistency rate between the FQ evaluation grades and the crop yield...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
<p>Comparisons of simulated and measured SSA under different cultivars and N rates.</p
<p>Comparison of regression methods relative to their ability to handle different types of data prob...
b: Correlation of growth parameters to each other and to yield in the varieties.</p
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
Comparison of ranking of CSA practices between farm profitability and aggregate profitability.</p
<p>Comparison between the computed and measured discharge, using the different methods.</p
Comparison of the proposed method with other conventional methods for throughput of each class.</p
<p>Comparisons of the performances of different methods by MCCs [Average difference (P value)].</p
Comparison of the performance of the four methods under the four distributions data.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
<p>The comparison of the real weights and the weights estimated from different methods.</p
<p>Comparisons where organic area was greater than 50% of total area reported.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG