<p>Comparisons where organic area was greater than 50% of total area reported.</p
Comparison of secondary outcomes in the primary groups that received ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus.</p
<p>Comparison of domestic and manufacturing water use intensity between calculated results and WB re...
The comparison between the theoretical ammonium production calculated by 100% conversion rate and th...
<p>Comparison of the FQ grades as evaluated by both methods with the crop yield grades.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Comparison between the predicted maize area fraction versus observed FAO maize area fraction at Admi...
<p>Comparison of journals based on the percentage of articles to contain a resource mention.</p
<p>Comparisons of relative change of <i>k</i> value between different litter manipulation treatments...
Comparison between the predicted area fraction versus the observed FAO area fraction comparison for ...
Comparison based on the place of residence of the respondents and the p-value for the association ba...
Comparison of classification accuracies of dataset 2 with different classifiers.</p
<p>Classification accuracies(%) of the subjects under the two different conditions.</p
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
Comparison of the pile quantities and costs for various embankment specifications.</p
Comparison of classification accuracies of dataset 1 with different classifiers.</p
Comparison of secondary outcomes in the primary groups that received ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus.</p
<p>Comparison of domestic and manufacturing water use intensity between calculated results and WB re...
The comparison between the theoretical ammonium production calculated by 100% conversion rate and th...
<p>Comparison of the FQ grades as evaluated by both methods with the crop yield grades.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Comparison between the predicted maize area fraction versus observed FAO maize area fraction at Admi...
<p>Comparison of journals based on the percentage of articles to contain a resource mention.</p
<p>Comparisons of relative change of <i>k</i> value between different litter manipulation treatments...
Comparison between the predicted area fraction versus the observed FAO area fraction comparison for ...
Comparison based on the place of residence of the respondents and the p-value for the association ba...
Comparison of classification accuracies of dataset 2 with different classifiers.</p
<p>Classification accuracies(%) of the subjects under the two different conditions.</p
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
Comparison of the pile quantities and costs for various embankment specifications.</p
Comparison of classification accuracies of dataset 1 with different classifiers.</p
Comparison of secondary outcomes in the primary groups that received ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus.</p
<p>Comparison of domestic and manufacturing water use intensity between calculated results and WB re...
The comparison between the theoretical ammonium production calculated by 100% conversion rate and th...
DOI
Add to ORKG