Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.
- Matthew W. Mitchell (127466)
Publication date
April 2015
DOIAbstract
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
A comparison of recalculated power spectra observables from results of the two extraction methods.</...
<p>Comparison of efficiency of simultaneous detection versus standard technique.</p
<p>Power comparison between the four exact testing procedures for N = 20, 30, 50, 80, and 100 from r...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
<p>The comparison of the real weights and the weights estimated from different methods.</p
<p>Comparisons of the performances of different methods by MCCs [Average difference (P value)].</p
<p>Comparison of regression methods relative to their ability to handle different types of data prob...
<p>This includes all the data from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal....
<p>Comparison of results from our analyses and from two MetaPhlAn based analyses.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Comparison of the performance of the four methods under the four distributions data.</p
<p>Power of (a) random-effect, (b) fixed-effect meta-analysis and (c) heterogeneity meta-analysis me...
<p>Comparison of accuracy and precision of different methods based median and standard deviation of ...
<p>Pairwise comparison of agreement among laboratory methods using crude agreement percentages and k...
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
A comparison of recalculated power spectra observables from results of the two extraction methods.</...
<p>Comparison of efficiency of simultaneous detection versus standard technique.</p
<p>Power comparison between the four exact testing procedures for N = 20, 30, 50, 80, and 100 from r...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
<p>The comparison of the real weights and the weights estimated from different methods.</p
<p>Comparisons of the performances of different methods by MCCs [Average difference (P value)].</p
<p>Comparison of regression methods relative to their ability to handle different types of data prob...
<p>This includes all the data from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal....
<p>Comparison of results from our analyses and from two MetaPhlAn based analyses.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Comparison of the performance of the four methods under the four distributions data.</p
<p>Power of (a) random-effect, (b) fixed-effect meta-analysis and (c) heterogeneity meta-analysis me...
<p>Comparison of accuracy and precision of different methods based median and standard deviation of ...
<p>Pairwise comparison of agreement among laboratory methods using crude agreement percentages and k...
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
A comparison of recalculated power spectra observables from results of the two extraction methods.</...
<p>Comparison of efficiency of simultaneous detection versus standard technique.</p
<p>Power comparison between the four exact testing procedures for N = 20, 30, 50, 80, and 100 from r...
Add to ORKG