<p>(a) Taxonomic cladogram obtained using LEfSe analysis of the 16S rRNA sequences. Treatment groups are indicated by the different colors; (b) Computed LDA scores of the relative abundance difference between the BFe and SFe groups. Comparison of the relative abundance at the (c) phylum; (d) order; (e) family; and (f) genus levels in the BFe and SFe groups.</p
<p>The average relative abundance of each clade was more than 0.05%. (a) Visualization of differenti...
This figure shows the bacterial groups that were different in abundance between the high-fat (HF) co...
GE: Fecal samples collected from genetically engineered pigs. WT: Fecal samples collected from wild ...
(A) Cladogram representing statistically significant differences in bacterial clades among the three...
Genera with an LDA score >4.0 (p<0.01) are depicted, based on their scores. Prefixes of the bacteria...
<p>Taxa with relative abundance ≥ 0.1% present in at least one sample in each location were included...
This figure shows the bacterial groups that were different in abundance between the high-fat (HF) an...
Relative abundance of (A) OTU32 (Ruminococcus torques) for Group A, (B) OTU206 (Negativibacillus mas...
a. Diets within fecal sample type, b. Diets within rumen liquor sample type, c. Fecal and rumen liqu...
Phylogenetic relationships among significant bacterial biomarkers are indicated in the cladogram (to...
<p><b>a:</b> Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) cladogram of differentially abundant t...
(A) Differences in abundance of taxonomic groups among all three sample. LDA cutoff = 2. Differentia...
<p>AZM, mice treated with azithromycin; FFC, mice treated with florfenicol. Due to the length of bac...
<p>Families and OTUs are ranked in descending order of mean relative abundance among all subjects. B...
<p>(A) Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences between can...
<p>The average relative abundance of each clade was more than 0.05%. (a) Visualization of differenti...
This figure shows the bacterial groups that were different in abundance between the high-fat (HF) co...
GE: Fecal samples collected from genetically engineered pigs. WT: Fecal samples collected from wild ...
(A) Cladogram representing statistically significant differences in bacterial clades among the three...
Genera with an LDA score >4.0 (p<0.01) are depicted, based on their scores. Prefixes of the bacteria...
<p>Taxa with relative abundance ≥ 0.1% present in at least one sample in each location were included...
This figure shows the bacterial groups that were different in abundance between the high-fat (HF) an...
Relative abundance of (A) OTU32 (Ruminococcus torques) for Group A, (B) OTU206 (Negativibacillus mas...
a. Diets within fecal sample type, b. Diets within rumen liquor sample type, c. Fecal and rumen liqu...
Phylogenetic relationships among significant bacterial biomarkers are indicated in the cladogram (to...
<p><b>a:</b> Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) cladogram of differentially abundant t...
(A) Differences in abundance of taxonomic groups among all three sample. LDA cutoff = 2. Differentia...
<p>AZM, mice treated with azithromycin; FFC, mice treated with florfenicol. Due to the length of bac...
<p>Families and OTUs are ranked in descending order of mean relative abundance among all subjects. B...
<p>(A) Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences between can...
<p>The average relative abundance of each clade was more than 0.05%. (a) Visualization of differenti...
This figure shows the bacterial groups that were different in abundance between the high-fat (HF) co...
GE: Fecal samples collected from genetically engineered pigs. WT: Fecal samples collected from wild ...