Add to ORKGThe Federal Rules of Evidence exclude expert scientific testimony when it has been developed without regard for accepted scientific methods. This case focuses on expert scientific evidence. Such evidence plays a vital and often dispositive role in modern litigation. For scientific evidence to be helpful to the factfinder it must meet some minimal threshold of reliability. To hold otherwise would be to allow a system of adjudication based more on chance than on reason
The U.S. Supreme Court considered an appeal by the defendant, General Electric Co., in a products li...
In the 1993 landmark case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court ar...
The goal of this paper is to outline the legal and scientific implications of the admissibility stan...
On its face, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was about as easy a case as the Supreme Court ge...
The Federal Rules of Evidence exclude expert scientific testimony when it has been developed without...
In the US Supreme Court's Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision, federal judges were d...
In what he describes as a premortem on Joiner v. General Electric Co., a case before the Supreme C...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
Daubert inspired appeals again occupied much of the Eleventh Circuit\u27s time during the survey per...
Historically, trial courts have been cautious about allowing juries to hear testimony from scientifi...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., the Supreme Court sensibly held that testimony purpo...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
The U.S. Supreme Court considered an appeal by the defendant, General Electric Co., in a products li...
In the 1993 landmark case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court ar...
The goal of this paper is to outline the legal and scientific implications of the admissibility stan...
On its face, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was about as easy a case as the Supreme Court ge...
The Federal Rules of Evidence exclude expert scientific testimony when it has been developed without...
In the US Supreme Court's Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision, federal judges were d...
In what he describes as a premortem on Joiner v. General Electric Co., a case before the Supreme C...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
In reaching its recent decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States S...
Daubert inspired appeals again occupied much of the Eleventh Circuit\u27s time during the survey per...
Historically, trial courts have been cautious about allowing juries to hear testimony from scientifi...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., the Supreme Court sensibly held that testimony purpo...
In one of the most anticlimactic cases in recent years, the Supreme Court ruled on the last day of i...
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument...
In the United States, Federal Rules of Evidence 702, the Frye and Daubert standards govern the admis...
The U.S. Supreme Court considered an appeal by the defendant, General Electric Co., in a products li...
In the 1993 landmark case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court ar...
The goal of this paper is to outline the legal and scientific implications of the admissibility stan...