Add to ORKGIn Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., the Supreme Court sensibly held that testimony purporting to be scientific is admissible only if it possesses sufficient indicia of scientific validity. In Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, the Court more questionably held that opinion evidence based on "technical" and "specialized" knowledge must meet the same admissibility threshold as scientific testimony. This Article addresses the implications of these two decisions for opinion evidence presented by mental health professionals in criminal trials
This article, part of a symposium on the opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court in Logerquist v. McVey...
The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissi...
The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissi...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., the Supreme Court sensibly held that testimony purpo...
The goal of this paper is to outline the legal and scientific implications of the admissibility stan...
Starting with the Daubert case, courtroom rules and guides regulating the admissibility of scientifi...
Starting with the Daubert case, courtroom rules and guides regulating the admissibility of scientifi...
Starting with the Daubert case, courtroom rules and guides regulating the admissibility of scientifi...
Despite the establishment of the Daubert standard in 1993, the evidentiary criteria are rarely used ...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
On its face, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was about as easy a case as the Supreme Court ge...
Daubert inspired appeals again occupied much of the Eleventh Circuit\u27s time during the survey per...
In the US Supreme Court's Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision, federal judges were d...
Following the lead of clinicians, the use of hypnosis in criminal investigations has increased over ...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., ' the Supreme Court declared that admissibility of an e...
This article, part of a symposium on the opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court in Logerquist v. McVey...
The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissi...
The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissi...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., the Supreme Court sensibly held that testimony purpo...
The goal of this paper is to outline the legal and scientific implications of the admissibility stan...
Starting with the Daubert case, courtroom rules and guides regulating the admissibility of scientifi...
Starting with the Daubert case, courtroom rules and guides regulating the admissibility of scientifi...
Starting with the Daubert case, courtroom rules and guides regulating the admissibility of scientifi...
Despite the establishment of the Daubert standard in 1993, the evidentiary criteria are rarely used ...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
On its face, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was about as easy a case as the Supreme Court ge...
Daubert inspired appeals again occupied much of the Eleventh Circuit\u27s time during the survey per...
In the US Supreme Court's Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision, federal judges were d...
Following the lead of clinicians, the use of hypnosis in criminal investigations has increased over ...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., ' the Supreme Court declared that admissibility of an e...
This article, part of a symposium on the opinion of the Arizona Supreme Court in Logerquist v. McVey...
The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissi...
The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissi...