Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissibility of expert testimony. We believe the best standard is simpler than the one chosen by the Court: The Daubert standard really is about discerning the trustworthiness of expert, and trustworthiness is best determined through an expert’s accounting of the error within his testimony. Lower courts have struggled with the Daubert standard. We offer evidence of the problem and propose a new standard that would capture the essence of Daubert but significantly simplify its application
The last few decades have seen a dramatic shift in the admissibility of expert testimony in American...
In civil commitments, courts face the task of predicting the dangerousness of a mentally ill person ...
Although the Supreme Court elaborated a standard for the admissibility of expert testimony in Dauber...
The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissi...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
In this essay, I will offer some thoughts on how we might reframe the issues governing the admissibi...
When Justice Blackmun wrote Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the assignm...
Expert economtc testunony can be excluded from evidence by a trial judge if the testimony does not m...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
This Article highlights lingering confusion in the caselaw as to the proper standard for the trial c...
This Article reviews the history of the evolution of the rules for the admissibility of expert testi...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[2] and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael,[3] the United S...
Conflicts of interest have significant implications for the reliability of scientific expert testimo...
The goal of this paper is to outline the legal and scientific implications of the admissibility stan...
Historically, trial courts have been cautious about allowing juries to hear testimony from scientifi...
The last few decades have seen a dramatic shift in the admissibility of expert testimony in American...
In civil commitments, courts face the task of predicting the dangerousness of a mentally ill person ...
Although the Supreme Court elaborated a standard for the admissibility of expert testimony in Dauber...
The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. laid down the standard for admissi...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court replaced the general acce...
In this essay, I will offer some thoughts on how we might reframe the issues governing the admissibi...
When Justice Blackmun wrote Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the assignm...
Expert economtc testunony can be excluded from evidence by a trial judge if the testimony does not m...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
This Article highlights lingering confusion in the caselaw as to the proper standard for the trial c...
This Article reviews the history of the evolution of the rules for the admissibility of expert testi...
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[2] and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael,[3] the United S...
Conflicts of interest have significant implications for the reliability of scientific expert testimo...
The goal of this paper is to outline the legal and scientific implications of the admissibility stan...
Historically, trial courts have been cautious about allowing juries to hear testimony from scientifi...
The last few decades have seen a dramatic shift in the admissibility of expert testimony in American...
In civil commitments, courts face the task of predicting the dangerousness of a mentally ill person ...
Although the Supreme Court elaborated a standard for the admissibility of expert testimony in Dauber...