The Federal Rules of Evidence exclude expert scientific testimony when it has been developed without regard for accepted scientific methods. This case focuses on expert scientific evidence. Such evidence plays a vital and often dispositive role in modern litigation. For scientific evidence to be helpful to the factfinder it must meet some minimal threshold of reliability. To hold otherwise would be to allow a system of adjudication based more on chance than on reason
Read court decisions and commentaries from 100, or evenfive years ago, and you will find that expert...
Scientific evidence is an inescapable facet of modern litigation. The Supreme Court; beginning with ...
Modern science forces the world to accept new theories and invention. Science has invented several t...
The Federal Rules of Evidence exclude expert scientific testimony when it has been developed without...
Historically, trial courts have been cautious about allowing juries to hear testimony from scientifi...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
This handout from a Maryland Judicial Institute presentation covers the Maryland Rules concerning ex...
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument...
Although the Supreme Court elaborated a standard for the admissibility of expert testimony in Dauber...
The thesis of this article is that the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutic...
For almost three-quarters of a century, the venerable standard announced in Frye v. United States go...
Handout from a day-long lecture on expert and scientific testimony at the Maryland Judicial Institut...
Amici seek to provide this Court with insight into the adverse effects on medical care and innovatio...
The panel here held that the government’s expert in a criminal trial can present hearsay for its tru...
As the culmination of a decade of rulemaking, in 1975 Congress enacted the Federal Rules of Evidence...
Read court decisions and commentaries from 100, or evenfive years ago, and you will find that expert...
Scientific evidence is an inescapable facet of modern litigation. The Supreme Court; beginning with ...
Modern science forces the world to accept new theories and invention. Science has invented several t...
The Federal Rules of Evidence exclude expert scientific testimony when it has been developed without...
Historically, trial courts have been cautious about allowing juries to hear testimony from scientifi...
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Fry...
This handout from a Maryland Judicial Institute presentation covers the Maryland Rules concerning ex...
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument...
Although the Supreme Court elaborated a standard for the admissibility of expert testimony in Dauber...
The thesis of this article is that the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutic...
For almost three-quarters of a century, the venerable standard announced in Frye v. United States go...
Handout from a day-long lecture on expert and scientific testimony at the Maryland Judicial Institut...
Amici seek to provide this Court with insight into the adverse effects on medical care and innovatio...
The panel here held that the government’s expert in a criminal trial can present hearsay for its tru...
As the culmination of a decade of rulemaking, in 1975 Congress enacted the Federal Rules of Evidence...
Read court decisions and commentaries from 100, or evenfive years ago, and you will find that expert...
Scientific evidence is an inescapable facet of modern litigation. The Supreme Court; beginning with ...
Modern science forces the world to accept new theories and invention. Science has invented several t...