Add to ORKGThis Casenote analyzes the Northern District of California\u27s recent decision in Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma, 375 F. Supp. 574 (N.D. Cal. 1974), which held that limiting the number of building permits for the purpose of restricting population growth was an unconstitutional infringement on the right to travel, where there is no shortage of municipal facilities to serve the new residence. The Casenote concludes that, although the court had authoritative support for its decision, it may be unwise to use the right to travel to invalidate a local zoning ordinance. Moreover, the right to travel test sets too high and inflexible a standard for local zoning ordinances to meet
ln 1930 defendant Gage acquired several lots in the City of Los Angeles. He constructed a residentia...
In an effort to prevent the spread of businesses specializing in adult entertainment, many cities ha...
On May 16, 2016, in Teixeira v. County of Alameda, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit h...
This Casenote analyzes the Northern District of California\u27s recent decision in Construction Indu...
Throughout the nation, suburbs located near established metropolitan centers are seeking ways to pro...
Local governments, housing advocates, and people who need affordable housing won a solid victory in ...
As communities attempt to control their growth through regulation of land use, there arises an inevi...
In Southwest Diversified, Inc. v. City of Brisbane, the California Court if Appeal held that a city ...
The zoning power, though based on the police power of the states, has traditionally been granted to ...
The idea that local land use law can intelligently shape settlement patterns was not a familiar conc...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
Desiring to operate a restaurant on his land, plaintiff petitioned the city trustees of Sunnyvale to...
This casenote examines the Supreme Court\u27s struggle to reconcile its focus on the facial validity...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...
This recent case discusses Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Los Angeles (Cal. App. 1966)
ln 1930 defendant Gage acquired several lots in the City of Los Angeles. He constructed a residentia...
In an effort to prevent the spread of businesses specializing in adult entertainment, many cities ha...
On May 16, 2016, in Teixeira v. County of Alameda, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit h...
This Casenote analyzes the Northern District of California\u27s recent decision in Construction Indu...
Throughout the nation, suburbs located near established metropolitan centers are seeking ways to pro...
Local governments, housing advocates, and people who need affordable housing won a solid victory in ...
As communities attempt to control their growth through regulation of land use, there arises an inevi...
In Southwest Diversified, Inc. v. City of Brisbane, the California Court if Appeal held that a city ...
The zoning power, though based on the police power of the states, has traditionally been granted to ...
The idea that local land use law can intelligently shape settlement patterns was not a familiar conc...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
Desiring to operate a restaurant on his land, plaintiff petitioned the city trustees of Sunnyvale to...
This casenote examines the Supreme Court\u27s struggle to reconcile its focus on the facial validity...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...
This recent case discusses Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Los Angeles (Cal. App. 1966)
ln 1930 defendant Gage acquired several lots in the City of Los Angeles. He constructed a residentia...
In an effort to prevent the spread of businesses specializing in adult entertainment, many cities ha...
On May 16, 2016, in Teixeira v. County of Alameda, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit h...