This Casenote analyzes the Northern District of California\u27s recent decision in Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma, 375 F. Supp. 574 (N.D. Cal. 1974), which held that limiting the number of building permits for the purpose of restricting population growth was an unconstitutional infringement on the right to travel, where there is no shortage of municipal facilities to serve the new residence. The Casenote concludes that, although the court had authoritative support for its decision, it may be unwise to use the right to travel to invalidate a local zoning ordinance. Moreover, the right to travel test sets too high and inflexible a standard for local zoning ordinances to meet
In 2011, the Ninth Circuit invalidated a Redondo Beach municipal ordinance that prohibited individua...
Suburban governments are becoming ever more adventuresome in their efforts to control housing develo...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...
This Casenote analyzes the Northern District of California\u27s recent decision in Construction Indu...
Throughout the nation, suburbs located near established metropolitan centers are seeking ways to pro...
The idea that local land use law can intelligently shape settlement patterns was not a familiar conc...
This casenote examines the Supreme Court\u27s struggle to reconcile its focus on the facial validity...
In Southwest Diversified, Inc. v. City of Brisbane, the California Court if Appeal held that a city ...
As communities attempt to control their growth through regulation of land use, there arises an inevi...
Desiring to operate a restaurant on his land, plaintiff petitioned the city trustees of Sunnyvale to...
This Article is concerned with the resolution of those problems of urban growth which invariably env...
After purchasing land which was subject to a zoning ordinance requiring a minimum lot size of 21,780...
The zoning power, though based on the police power of the states, has traditionally been granted to ...
In the recent Ohio Supreme Court decision of Forest City Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Eastlake, the ...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
In 2011, the Ninth Circuit invalidated a Redondo Beach municipal ordinance that prohibited individua...
Suburban governments are becoming ever more adventuresome in their efforts to control housing develo...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...
This Casenote analyzes the Northern District of California\u27s recent decision in Construction Indu...
Throughout the nation, suburbs located near established metropolitan centers are seeking ways to pro...
The idea that local land use law can intelligently shape settlement patterns was not a familiar conc...
This casenote examines the Supreme Court\u27s struggle to reconcile its focus on the facial validity...
In Southwest Diversified, Inc. v. City of Brisbane, the California Court if Appeal held that a city ...
As communities attempt to control their growth through regulation of land use, there arises an inevi...
Desiring to operate a restaurant on his land, plaintiff petitioned the city trustees of Sunnyvale to...
This Article is concerned with the resolution of those problems of urban growth which invariably env...
After purchasing land which was subject to a zoning ordinance requiring a minimum lot size of 21,780...
The zoning power, though based on the police power of the states, has traditionally been granted to ...
In the recent Ohio Supreme Court decision of Forest City Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Eastlake, the ...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
In 2011, the Ninth Circuit invalidated a Redondo Beach municipal ordinance that prohibited individua...
Suburban governments are becoming ever more adventuresome in their efforts to control housing develo...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...