Add to ORKGThis Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that involve challenges to entire zoning ordinances on exclusionary grounds. It argues that pragmatic and legal difficulties militate against any judicial imposition of affirmative relief not tailored to specific tracts of land and suggests that the most effective resolution of the problems confronted by low-income housing advocates lies in comprehensive legislative programs
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has refused to extend the decision in Appeal of Girsh to hold unconst...
South Burlington N.A.A.C.P. v. Mount Laural Township, 67 N.J. 151, 336 A.2d 713 (1975). Mount Laural...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...
This article discusses affirmative approaches to providing effective relief in two types of exclusio...
The zoning power, though based on the police power of the states, has traditionally been granted to ...
The courts have neither confronted nor always recognized the difficult conceptual and practical prob...
This Note is premised on the belief that courts must recognize the standing of adversely affected no...
This Note will analyze and evaluate the legal theories that may be employed to attack snob zoning in...
This article will examine both exclusionary zoning and subdivision control with a view toward analyz...
Exclusionary zoning limits residential development over large areas, and even entire cities or towns...
Plaintiff challenged the validity of an amendment to the zoning ordinance of the defendant township ...
Desiring to operate a restaurant on his land, plaintiff petitioned the city trustees of Sunnyvale to...
The purpose of this article is to explore the standing of future residents to bring suit in exclusio...
During the twentieth century the states have increasingly utilized their police power to control the...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has refused to extend the decision in Appeal of Girsh to hold unconst...
South Burlington N.A.A.C.P. v. Mount Laural Township, 67 N.J. 151, 336 A.2d 713 (1975). Mount Laural...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...
This article discusses affirmative approaches to providing effective relief in two types of exclusio...
The zoning power, though based on the police power of the states, has traditionally been granted to ...
The courts have neither confronted nor always recognized the difficult conceptual and practical prob...
This Note is premised on the belief that courts must recognize the standing of adversely affected no...
This Note will analyze and evaluate the legal theories that may be employed to attack snob zoning in...
This article will examine both exclusionary zoning and subdivision control with a view toward analyz...
Exclusionary zoning limits residential development over large areas, and even entire cities or towns...
Plaintiff challenged the validity of an amendment to the zoning ordinance of the defendant township ...
Desiring to operate a restaurant on his land, plaintiff petitioned the city trustees of Sunnyvale to...
The purpose of this article is to explore the standing of future residents to bring suit in exclusio...
During the twentieth century the states have increasingly utilized their police power to control the...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has refused to extend the decision in Appeal of Girsh to hold unconst...
South Burlington N.A.A.C.P. v. Mount Laural Township, 67 N.J. 151, 336 A.2d 713 (1975). Mount Laural...