Add to ORKGThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court has refused to extend the decision in Appeal of Girsh to hold unconstitutional a zoning ordinance which fails to provide for townhouse development, thus limiting the ability of low and moderate income individuals to own their own homes. In re Appeal of M.A. Kravitz Co., 501 Pa. 200, 460 A.2d 1075 (1983)
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that the State Bureau of Correction may not locate one of...
Desiring to operate a restaurant on his land, plaintiff petitioned the city trustees of Sunnyvale to...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that a suburban zoning ordinance which limited multi-fami...
Plaintiff challenged the validity of an amendment to the zoning ordinance of the defendant township ...
After purchasing land which was subject to a zoning ordinance requiring a minimum lot size of 21,780...
South Burlington N.A.A.C.P. v. Mount Laural Township, 67 N.J. 151, 336 A.2d 713 (1975). Mount Laural...
The plaintiff owned several lots in a subdivision which the defendant city changed from a class B ...
The zoning power, though based on the police power of the states, has traditionally been granted to ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a statute investing school districts with the power to ...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
A declaratory judgment proceeding was brought by persons owning property within a small-unit residen...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that minority nonresidents lack standing to attack a...
Plaintiff challenged the validity of an amendment to the zoning ordinance of the defendant township ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that the State Bureau of Correction may not locate one of...
Desiring to operate a restaurant on his land, plaintiff petitioned the city trustees of Sunnyvale to...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that a suburban zoning ordinance which limited multi-fami...
Plaintiff challenged the validity of an amendment to the zoning ordinance of the defendant township ...
After purchasing land which was subject to a zoning ordinance requiring a minimum lot size of 21,780...
South Burlington N.A.A.C.P. v. Mount Laural Township, 67 N.J. 151, 336 A.2d 713 (1975). Mount Laural...
The plaintiff owned several lots in a subdivision which the defendant city changed from a class B ...
The zoning power, though based on the police power of the states, has traditionally been granted to ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a statute investing school districts with the power to ...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
Plaintiff purchased undeveloped land located in defendant municipality, intending to construct dwell...
A declaratory judgment proceeding was brought by persons owning property within a small-unit residen...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that minority nonresidents lack standing to attack a...
Plaintiff challenged the validity of an amendment to the zoning ordinance of the defendant township ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that the State Bureau of Correction may not locate one of...
Desiring to operate a restaurant on his land, plaintiff petitioned the city trustees of Sunnyvale to...
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that i...